Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: YAKAMA LEGENDS CASINO

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of YAKAMA LEGENDS CASINO in 580 FORT ROAD, TOPPENISH, WA 98948 (NAICS 713210). OSHA activity number 340500081.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Yakama Legends Casino — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Yakama Legends Casino is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
580 FORT ROAD
City
TOPPENISH
State
WA
ZIP
98948
Mailing
P.O. BOX 151, TOPPENISH, WA 98948
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713210
Employees
690
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a)  Daubers Deli Kitchen;  Employees use corrosive cleaners Pure Bright Bleach and Oasis Multi-Quat Sanitizer and there is not an eyewash station in the work area to prevent permanent eye damage in case of splash.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $1,836 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:     a)  Environmental Services and Security Staff are potentially exposed to blood, saliva and other potentially infectious materials and the employer did not have a written Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1836
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:   a)  Environmental Services and Security Staff did not have the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series available to them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 II B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually:   a)  Environmental Services  and Security Staff were given bloodborne pathogens training initially upon hire, but were not given annual refresher training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a)   The employer does not have a written hazard communication program for managing the hazardous substances employees use including but not limited to: Simple Green, Pure Bright Bleach, Oasis Multi-Quat Sanitizer, Ace Upside Down Marking Paint, Ace Premium Enamel, Brass Metal Polish, Krylon paint, Rustoleum Enamel, Boiled Linseed Oil, Rodda Wall Pro, Sherwin Williams Super Paint, Columbia Premium Pro Paint, Ace Royal Paint, Ace Wasp and Hornet Killer, Bird Dog Leak Detector, Nu-Brite, and Flush Solvent
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1377
  • — Z (S) $2295

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  a)       Machine Tech Shop;  A spray bottle with a green liquid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  a)      The employer did not have a safety data sheet for the following hazardous substances including but not limited to: Ace Upside Down Marking Paint, Ace Premium Enamel, Brass Metal Polish, Krylon paint, Rustoleum Enamel, Boiled Linseed Oil, Rodda Wall Pro, Sherwin Williams Super Paint, Columbia Premium Pro Paint, Ace Royal Paint, Ace Wasp and Hornet Killer, Bird Dog Leak Detector, Nu-Brite, and Flush Solvent.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 80 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)      The employer did not provide chemical specific hazard communication training for employees.  Environmental Service employees did not receive hazard communication training for cleaning chemicals they use.  Maintenance employees did not receive hazard communication training for paint, compressed gasses, etc. they use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 600 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2015
Abate by
Jun 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  a)      Employees wear personal protective equipment including but not limited to gloves, goggles and face shields, but a personal protective hazard assessment was not documented in writing for the various job tasks and/or job types.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Yakama Legends Casino's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340500081.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.