Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOLDEN DRAGON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOLDEN DRAGON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in LOT # 316-4-4 NEW R1, MERIZO, GU 96915 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340504646.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Golden Dragon Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Golden Dragon Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT # 316-4-4 NEW R1
City
MERIZO
State
GU
ZIP
96915
Mailing
PMB 357 979 ARMY DRIVE, BARRIGADA, GU 96913
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails, and all other debris, were not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, construction materials and debris were not kept clear as there were cans, empty bags of cement, broken concrete blocks, pieces of rebar, and nails all over the exterior and interior of the house.  Employees were exposed to a hazard of falling to the same level onto the debris and the materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Aug 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not being protected by protective helmets:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, inside of the house, head protection was not worn while working below employees carrying 2 by 4 rebars and hand tools to build formwork on the roof and the interior of a two-story concrete building, exposing employees to a hazard of being struck by construction equipment and materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not being protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, on the 2nd floor of the roof, there was no fall protection for employees that were building formwork, exposing employees to a 10-foot fall hazard.     (b) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, on the 1st floor roof above the garage, there was no fall protection for employees walking and working less than 1 foot from the edge of the roof picking up rebars and 2 by 4 inch lumber, exposing employees to a 10-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, from the 1st floor roof of the garage to the 2nd floor roof of the house, an eleven foot long job-made ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing for the roof, exposing employees to a hazard of falling approximately 18 feet to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer failed to initiate and maintain programs that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment by competent persons designated by the employer:   (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, inspections were not completed to ensure compliance with OSHA regulations or the person that completed the inspections was not competent, as there were unguarded elevated surfaces, no housekeeping, no adequate washing facilities, no first aid supplies, no adequate ladders, no appropriate head protection, and no handrailing along the open side of a stairway.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.21 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  (a)  At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, employees were not instructed in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and regulations for fall, housekeeping, adequate washing facilities, first aid supplies, ladder safety, head protection, and handrails or guardrails along open-sided stairways, and how to control or eliminate unsafe conditions to prevent possible injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.50 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.50(c): In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, hospital, or physician, that was reasonably accessible in terms of time and distance to the worksite, which was available for the treatment of injured employees, a person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training from the U.S. Bureau of Mines, the American Red Cross, or equivalent training that can be verified by documentary evidence, was not available at the worksite to render first aid:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, no one on site had a valid certificate in first aid training and the nearest medical facility was more than 30 minutes away.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.50 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.50(d)(1): First aid supplies were not easily accessible when required:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, there were no first aid supplies onsite.  The first aid supplies were reportedly in the owner's truck, and the owner was not always onsite.  Employees used circular saws to cut wood for formwork at the project.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 6, 2015
Abate by
Sep 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  (a) At the project on or about March 27, 2015 and at times prior thereto, near the front entrance side of the first level, there were no stairrail systems on the unprotected edges of a stairway with 14 risers to the first landing to the second level.  Employees used the stairs to access the second level and were exposed to a hazard of falling approximately 10 feet to the concrete floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Golden Dragon Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340504646.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.