SAIPAN, MP —
OSHA Inspection: GPPC, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GPPC, INC. in INTERIOR ALTERATION PROJECT, D F S BEACH ROAD, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340525393.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GPPC, INC.
- Site address
- INTERIOR ALTERATION PROJECT, D F S BEACH ROAD
- City
- SAIPAN
- State
- MP
- ZIP
- 96950
- Mailing
- PMB 898, BOX 10001, SAIPAN, MP 96950
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,273 · Current $2,291 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form and scrap lumber with protruding nails, and all other debris, were not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: Near the north wall of the project, debris was not kept cleared from work areas and passageways as there were steel studs, broken drywall, pieces of conduit, and pieces of lumber on the floor, exposing employees to the hazards of falling to the same level on the debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2291
- — Z (S) $3273
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,273 · Current $2,291 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification: Near the north wall of the project, electrical equipment was not used as designed to be used as a 2 by 4 inch electrical box with a 110 VAC receptacle laid on the floor instead of being mounted and a nonmetallic sheathed cable (Romex) laid on the floor. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2291
- — Z (S) $3273
1926.405 B01
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(1): Conductors entering boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors entered were not effectively closed: Near the north wall of the project, the nonmetallic sheathed cable was not protected from abrasion where it entered an electrical box with an energized 110 VAC outlet. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers. In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: (a.) Near the north wall of the project, there was no cover on a junction box designed for a receptacle. The energized wires in the box were spliced to a nonmetallic sheathed cable that supplied power to a receptacle in an electrical box that lay on the floor. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity. (b.) Near the north wall of the project, there was no cover or faceplate on the outlet box that lay on the floor with an energized 110 VAC outlet. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,273 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors: Near the south wall of the project, there were no ground fault circuit interrupters or assured equipment grounding conductor program to protect employees that used an extension cord to power a 110 VAC Makita FS4200 screw gun to attach drywall. Employees were exposed to the hazard of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3273
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous: (a.) Near the center of the project, there was no grounding on the flexible cord receptacle used to power a 110 VAC Makita AVT, HM 1214C jack hammer, exposing employees to the hazard of contacting electricity. (b.) Near the north wall of the project, there was no grounding on the 110 VAC receptacle in an electrical box that lay on the floor. Employees that used the receptacle to power portable tools and lamps were exposed to the hazard of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.403 I02 I
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,273 · Current $2,291 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Except as required or permitted elsewhere in this subpart, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more was not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, or by any of the following means: (a.) Near the center of the project, the splices of fixture wires were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or enclosures. The fixture wires supplied power to 110 VAC, 4 foot long fluorescent bulbs in two separate light fixtures. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity. (b.) Near the north wall of the project, the splices of nonmetallic sheathed cable (Romex) were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or enclosures. The cable was spliced to the energized wires from an electric box on the wall. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2291
- — Z (S) $3273
1926.405 A02 II E
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): All lamps for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage: Near the center of the project, 4 foot long fluorescent bulbs in two separate light fixtures were not protected from damage. One fixture had one end on the floor and the other end leaning against a scaffold. The other fixture had one end on the floor and the other end leaning against a column. There were no protective covers over the bulbs. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 I02 I
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(i)(2)(i): Fixture wires may not be used for installation in lighting, fixtures and in similar equipment where not enclosed or protected and subject to bending or twisting in use: Near the center of the project, fixture wires, supplying power to 4 foot long fluorescent bulbs in two separate light fixtures, were not enclosed or protected as they laid on the floor and were draped over metal scaffold cross braces. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 J01 II
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(ii): Fixtures, lampholders, rosettes, and receptacles were not securely supported: Near the center of the project, 4 foot long fluorescent bulbs in two separate light fixtures were not protected from damage. One fixture had one end on the floor and the other end leaning against a scaffold. The other fixture had one end on the floor and the other end leaning against a column. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 J01 III
- Issued
- Jun 1, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(iii): Portable lamps were not wired with flexible cords and attachment plugs of the polarized or grounding type: Near the center of the project, portable lamps were not wired with flexible cords and attachment plugs of the polarized or grounding type as fixture wires with splices were used to power 4 foot long fluorescent bulbs in two separate light fixtures. Employees, applying joint compound on the drywall, troweling concrete on the floor, and moving tiles and other supplies near the fixtures, were exposed to the hazards of contacting electricity.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Gppc, INC.
View Gppc, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in MP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340525393.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.