Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WESTFIELD ELECTROPLATING CO., INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WESTFIELD ELECTROPLATING CO., INC. in 68 NORTH ELM STREET, WESTFIELD, MA 01085 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 340563287.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Westfield Electroplating CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Westfield Electroplating CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
68 NORTH ELM STREET
City
WESTFIELD
State
MA
ZIP
01085
Mailing
P O BOX 298, WESTFIELD, MA 01085
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that on April 7, 2015, an employee was exposed to chemical burns on the right leg from the lower thigh to ankle from an open, half-full, four-liter beaker of Hydrofluoric (HF) acid placed on the back edge of a electroplating rinse tank on the nickel line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:  In the nickel rinse tank area at 68 North Elm Street Westfield, MA: On or about April 7, 2015, the employer did not ensure a chemical handler used the PPE required, specifically aprons or chemical resistant clothing, by the employer's certified hazard assessment while performing chemical handling work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.132 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,590 · Current $2,295 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(i): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE on knowing when PPE is necessary:  a) In the Nickel plating area and Dow line at 68 North Elm Street Westfield, MA: On or about April 7, 2015, the employer did not provide training on PPE use to a nickel electroplating employee, who did not wear a chemical-protective apron, who transferred and transported approximately 2 liters of Hydrofluoric Acid from a Dow line tank to the Nickel line in an open-top 4 liter beaker.  b) In the Nickel plating area at 68 North Elm Street Westfield, MA: On or about April 7, 2015, the employer did not provide training on PPE use to a chemical handler employee who did not wear a chemical-protective apron during chemical additions of acids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $4590

1910.132 F01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1460

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(ii): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE on knowing what PPE is necessary:  a) In the Nickel plating area and Dow line at 68 North Elm Street Westfield, MA: On or about April 7, 2015, the employer did not provide training on PPE use to a nickel electroplating employee, who did not wear a chemical-protective apron, who transferred and transported approximately 2 liters of Hydrofluoric Acid from a Dow line tank to the Nickel line in an open-top 4 liter beaker.  b) In the Nickel plating area at 68 North Elm Street Westfield, MA: On or about April 7, 2015, the employer did not provide training on PPE use to a chemical handler employee who did not wear a chemical-protective apron during chemical additions of acids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Westfield Electroplating CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340563287.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.