Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in HIGH STREET AND HWY 96, WRIGHTSTOWN, WI 54180 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 340630136.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lunda Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lunda Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HIGH STREET AND HWY 96
City
WRIGHTSTOWN
State
WI
ZIP
54180
Mailing
W2332 CROSSTOWN ROAD, HILBERT, WI 54129
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
650
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges are under construction, but who was not engaged in the leading edge work, was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  On or about 05-14-15 on a 54 ft. W bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees walking and working in the materials staging area and who where not engaged in leading edge work, were not protected with conventional fall protection equipment. Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 15 feet above surface level from:   a)  The partially guarded edges along the east and west sides of the bridge in the material staging area. Single wire ropes were installed along each side edge of the bridge.  b)  The unguarded southern edge of the material staging area adjacent to the leading edge work area. Caution tape was installed parallel to the leading edge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5500

1926.502 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface:  a)  On or about 05-14-15 on a 54 ft. W bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees were working at approximately 15 ft. above surface level without an adequate guardrail system on the east and west side edges of the bridge in the staging area.  A single wire rope was used at each side edge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 B09

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(9): The employer failed to ensure that wire rope used as a top rail was flagged at 6-foot intervals with high-visibility material.  a)  On or about 05-14-15 on a 54 ft. W bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees were working at approximately 15 ft. above surface level using wire rope on the sides of the bridge along the materials staging area for fall protection without attaching any markings/flags.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  a)  On or about 05-14-15 on a 54 ft. W bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees were working at heights of six (6) ft. to approximately fifteen (15) ft. above surface level each utilizing a personal fall arrest system with the body harness attachment point located below the center of the back.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4400

1926.503 C03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): When inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill, the employer shall retrain the affected employee.  a)  On or about 05-14-15 on a 54 ft. W bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees who where working on a bridge at heights of approximately 12 ft. and 15ft were not provided with retraining in fall protection safety from the employer when employees were using improperly donned body harnesses and inadequate fall protection equipment such as inadequate guardrail system on side edges and unsecured floor hole covers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 I03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2015
Abate by
Aug 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(3): All covers were not secured when installed so as to prevent accidental displacement by the wind, equipment, or employees:  a)  On or about 05-14-15 on a bridge along High Street in Wrightstown, employees were walking beside and/or on top of covered holes approximately 3 ft. W x 4 ft. L with a surface edge six (6) ft. above the top of a bridge pier and 12 ft. above the surface level without securing the covers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4400

View Lunda Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340630136.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.