GREEN BAY, WI —
OSHA Inspection: LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 401 N WASHINGTON, GREEN BAY, WI 54313 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340733120.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 401 N WASHINGTON
- City
- GREEN BAY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54313
- Mailing
- 6903 ARROW DRIVE, MANITOWOC, WI 54220
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.300 A
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,320 · Current $1,320
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(a): Hand tool(s), power tool(s) or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition: a) On or about 06-25-15, employer provided a 4.5 inch disc grinder with a damaged cord to employees who were utilizing the grinder to install awnings and balcony railing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1320
- — Z (S) $1320
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) On or about 06-24-15, an employee was walking/working at the edge of a balcony installing railing at greater than ten feet above surface level without utilizing conventional fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.501 B15
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(15): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 meters) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) On or about 06-24-15, employees were walking/working from on top of balcony floor joists at greater than 10 feet above surface level without any and/or complete covers or decking over the joists.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) On or about 06-25-15 at 401 N Washington St. in Green Bay, employer did not provide written certification of required fall protection safety training for employees working at heights greater than six (6) feet. Four employees had been working on balconies at heights greater than 10, 20, and 30 ft. with two of the employees working on the top of awnings at greater than 10 ft. above surface level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D11
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a) On or about 06-25-15, employees were working on the edge of balconies at greater than 10 feet above surface level each using a lifeline choked around door and window jambs as the personal fall protection anchor without any rope abrasion protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. a) On or about 06-25-15, employees were using lifelines wrapped around door/window jambs as the anchor points of personal fall arrest systems at heights greater than 10 feet above surface level. The lifeline was not designed to be used as anchor equipment in a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Lakeland Construction, INC.
View Lakeland Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340733120.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.