Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 401 N WASHINGTON, GREEN BAY, WI 54313 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340733120.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lakeland Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lakeland Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
401 N WASHINGTON
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54313
Mailing
6903 ARROW DRIVE, MANITOWOC, WI 54220
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.300 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $1,320
29 CFR 1926.300(a): Hand tool(s), power tool(s) or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition:  a)  On or about 06-25-15, employer provided a 4.5 inch disc grinder with a damaged cord to employees who were utilizing the grinder to install awnings and balcony railing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $1320

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a)  On or about 06-24-15, an employee was walking/working at the edge of a balcony installing railing at greater than ten feet above surface level without utilizing conventional fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.501 B15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(15): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 meters) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a)  On or about 06-24-15, employees were walking/working from on top of balcony floor joists at greater than 10 feet above surface level without any and/or complete covers or decking over the joists.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.   a)  On or about 06-25-15 at 401 N Washington St. in Green Bay, employer did not provide written certification of required fall protection safety training for employees working at heights greater than six (6) feet.  Four employees had been working on balconies at heights greater than 10, 20, and 30 ft. with two of the employees working on the top of awnings at greater than 10 ft. above surface level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded:    a)  On or about 06-25-15, employees were working on the edge of balconies at greater than 10 feet above surface level each using a lifeline choked around door and window jambs as the personal fall protection anchor without any rope abrasion protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2015
Abate by
Oct 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.    a)  On or about 06-25-15, employees were using lifelines wrapped around door/window jambs as the anchor points of personal fall arrest systems at heights greater than 10 feet above surface level.  The lifeline was not designed to be used as anchor equipment in a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Lakeland Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340733120.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.