Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAO CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of RAO CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 441 STAGELINE RD, HUDSON, WI 54016 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340750082.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RAO Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RAO Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
441 STAGELINE RD
City
HUDSON
State
WI
ZIP
54016
Mailing
11761 COUNTY ROAD A, WAUSAU, WI 54401
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; Employees were working at heights in excess of 6 feet without adequate fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; The employer had not ensured adequate guarding, marking or covering of floor holes on floors above ground level in excess of 6 feet to prevent injury to employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(iii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from objects falling through holes (including skylights) by covers:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; The employer had not adequately guarded or covered floor holes above ground level in excess of 6 feet to prevent items from falling through them and injuring employees on lower levels.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.501(c): When employees were exposed to falling objects, the employer did not implement one of the following measures; -1 Erect toeboards, screens, or guardrail systems to prevent objects from falling from higher levels; or, -2 Erect a canopy structure; or -3 Barricade the area to which objects could fall, prevent employees from entering the barricaded area, and keep objects away from the edge of the higher level:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; Employees on lower levels were not protected from falling objects by one or more of the prescribed means listed in 1926.501(c) on the railings which were installed as fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; The employer had not ensured that a midrail was installed in a wall opening approximately 12 foot above lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; The employer did not provide written certification of fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; An extension ladder used as a primary means to access the second floor of the structure did not extend the required 36 inches above the point of access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2015
Abate by
Nov 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  (a) 441 Stageline Rd., Hudson, WI; Employees were using a step ladder that was not in the open and locked position, but was propped up against the wall, in the folded position, on the third story of the structure to perform work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View RAO Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340750082.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.