Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MOUNT VERNON MILLS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MOUNT VERNON MILLS, INC. in 2850 GAINESVILLE HWY, ALTO, GA 30510 (NAICS 313210). OSHA activity number 340786482.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mount Vernon Mills, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mount Vernon Mills, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2850 GAINESVILLE HWY
City
ALTO
State
GA
ZIP
30510
Mailing
2850 GAINESVILLE HWY, ALTO, GA 30510
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313210
Employees
715
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  On or about July 16, 2015, on equipment such as, but not limited to, the MSL cleaner:  lockout steps used by technicians were not included in the machine specific procedures.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C04 II C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:  On or about July 16, 2015, on equipment such as, but not limited to, the Suessen Link Spinning machine:  The order that locks/tags were to be removed was not included in the machine specific procedure.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:    a) On or about July 16, 2015, on equipment such as, but not limited to, the MSL beater machine:  The step to verify that the equipment was de-energized was not specific and said to ensure that energy sources(s) are 100% disconnected by operating the start button or other normal operating controls.      b) On or about July 16, 2015, on equipment such as, but not limited to, the Suessen Link Spinning machine:  The step to verify that the equipment was de-energized was not specific and said to ensure that energy sources(s) are 100% disconnected by operating the start button or other normal operating controls.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:   On or about July 16, 2015, annual lockout/tagout audits did not include a review of the machine specific procedures.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  On or about July 16, 2015, authorized employees had not been adequately trained to understand that affected employees could not assist in removing chokes.  Affected employees had not been adequately trained to understand that they could not assist in removing chokes.  Affected employees have not been trained to know the energy sources, how to lock out the machines, and do not have locks that would permit them to lock out machines.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.134 K01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(iv): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of how to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator:   On or about July 16, 2015, employees did not know to test the respirator seal each time the respirator is used.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about July 16, 2015, employees did not know the purpose of SDS or where to find them.  Employees use chemicals such as, but not limited to, cotton and machine oil.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Mount Vernon Mills, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340786482.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.