DUBLIN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: KINETICS NOISE CONTROL
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KINETICS NOISE CONTROL in 6300 IRELAN PLACE, DUBLIN, OH 43017 (NAICS 334512). OSHA activity number 340814953.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINETICS NOISE CONTROL
- Site address
- 6300 IRELAN PLACE
- City
- DUBLIN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43017
- Mailing
- 6300 IRELAN PLACE, DUBLIN, OH 43017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334512
- Employees
- 165
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following: 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A): A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure; 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy; 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them; and 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. a. At the workplace, the employer did not provide energy control procedures that included a specific statement of intended use, specific sequential procedures for securing the machine, and specific requirements to verify the effectiveness of the energy control measures, for employees that were engaged in activities on equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3640
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.176 G
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(g): Guarding. Covers and/or guard- rails shall be provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc. a. At the workplace, while transporting materials between the main building and the North building, employees drove forklifts across a bridge over a ditch that was not equipped with guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. a. At the workplace, an Edgewater quilting machine, model 6413, serial # M80396, had a needle bar that was not guarded to prevent the operator from accidental contact with moving parts. b. At the workplace, an Edgewater quilting machine, model 8413, serial # M79314, had a needle bar that was not guarded to prevent the operator from accidental contact with moving parts. c. At the workplace, a Skil Drill Press, model number unknown, had a rotating chuck that was not guarded exposing employees to a caught-in hazard. d. At the workplace, a Rigid Drill Press, model DP15000, had a rotating chuck that was not guarded exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2880
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by this standard, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more shall be guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures. a. At the workplace, in the North building, there was an electrical box mounted on a Vertrod machine that did not have a cover installed to prevent accidental employee exposure to contact with electrical current from exposed open wiring.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2880
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.334 B02
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(b)(2): Reclosing circuits after protective device operation. After a circuit is deenergized by a circuit protective device, the circuit may not be manually reenergized until it has been determined that the equipment and circuit can be safely energized. The repetitive manual reclosing of circuit breakers or reenergizing circuits through replaced fuses is prohibited. a. At the workplace, in the North building, employees repetitively replaced fuses to reenergize the Vertrod machine electrical circuit that was deenergized by the circuit protective device, thereby exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. a. At the workplace, employees were exposed to blood while cleaning after a bleeding injury had occurred. The employer did not have a written exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2880
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer shall train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section. Such training must be provided at no cost to the employee and during working hours. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program. a. At the workplace, the employer did not provide annual bloodborne pathogen training to employees with occupational exposure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2880
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,600 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle. a. At the workplace, in the Fiberglass Department, a PA 7000 Scheer saw did not have the point of operation adequately guarded, thereby exposing employees to an amputation hazard. On July 22, 2015, an employee suffered multiple finger amputations on both hands while operating a PA 7000 Scheer saw. b. At the workplace, in the North building, a grommet machine equipped with a two hand control device had one of the push buttons taped in the pushed position, therefore the point of operation was not adequately guarded. Kinetics Noise Control was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 111186, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on April 12, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 6300 Irelan Place, Dublin, Ohio 43017.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (R) $12600
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): In every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial, or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official shall be marked on plates of approved design which shall be supplied and securely affixed by the owner of the building, or his duly authorized agent, in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate. Such plates shall not be removed or defaced but, if lost, removed, or defaced, shall be replaced by the owner or his agent. a. At the workplace, in the main production building, the mezzanine used for storage did not have conspicuous load rating plates located in areas to which they relate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.304 F01 VIII
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Feb 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(viii): Circuit breakers used as switches in 120-volt and 277-volt, fluorescent lighting circuits shall be listed and marked "SWD." a. At the workplace, in the main production building, employees utilized circuit breakers that were not listed and labeled as "SWD" as switches for facility lighting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Kinetics Noise Control
View Kinetics Noise Control's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334512)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340814953.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.