Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THURSTON MANUFACTURING CO.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THURSTON MANUFACTURING CO. in 1708 H AVE, THURSTON, NE 68062 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 340846179.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Thurston Manufacturing CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Thurston Manufacturing CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1708 H AVE
City
THURSTON
State
NE
ZIP
68062
Mailing
PO BOX 218, THURSTON, NE 68062
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section:      Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and Throughout the facility:  Lockout/tagout procedures did not meet the requirements outlined above.  The developed procedures are vague in that they do not clearly specify the techniques in which lockout operations will be performed and they do not clearly indicate the locations where energy may be isolated (switches, valves, breaker numbers, etc).          Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2800
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,850 · Current $1,654 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):     The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and Throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to conduct periodic inspections of the energy control procedures as outlined in the standard.        Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1654
  • — Z (S) $3850

1910.184 C09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $3,773 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(9):     Employee(s) were not kept clear of load(s) suspended, or about to be lifted by sling(s):    Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to ensure that employees were kept clear of suspended loads.  On August 6, 2015, two employees sustained injuries when a suspended load fell due to failed components used in the rigging.  The employees were installing covers over a trailer dollys components prior to the dolly going into the paint area.         Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3773
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $3,773 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(d):     Sling(s) and fastenings were not inspected each day or during use and were not removed from service when damaged or defective:    Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to ensure that slings and fastenings were inspected before use and removed when deficiencies were noted.  In this case, a shop fabricated sling device had elongated rings which also showed signs of wear.  The sling device was used for a lift where other components failed due to insufficient capacity for the weight of the lift.         Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3773
  • — Z (S) $5390

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1):      The employer has failed to ensure that alloy steel chain slings had permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach.         Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to ensure that slings and fastenings were marked with some type of durable identification such as a tag to show the items listed above.  On August 6, 2015, employees used a sling and other components to lift a load without knowing the capacity of the items used to facilitate the lift.  None of the components were labeled as required.         Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 E02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(2)(ii):     Makeshift link(s) or fastener(s) formed from bolts, or other such attachment(s) were used to connect links or fastenings on alloy steel chain sling(s):    Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to that slings used for lifting did not have components which were makeshift or not designed for that purpose.  In this case, a sling used in a lift on August 6, 2015, was fabricated using components which were not designed for lifting.  The main ring of the sling appears to have been made using a section of alloy piping cross cut to create a ring.  Additionally, the alloy chain was welded to the ring which may have had a negative effect to the lifting capacity.        Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 E04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2015
Abate by
Nov 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(4):     The employer has failed to ensure that before use, each new, repaired, or reconditioned alloy steel chain sling, including all welded components in the sling assembly, were proof tested by the sling manufacturer or equivalent entity, in accordance with paragraph 5.2 of the American Society of Testing and Materials Specification A291-65:          Work site located at 1708 H Ave, Thurston, Nebraska and throughout the facility:  The employer has failed to ensure that an alloy steel chain sling was proof tested as required to show its capacity.  The sling in question had been in use at the site for 20 years.        Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Thurston Manufacturing CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340846179.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.