FORT GORDON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in 423 22ND STREET BLDG #21515, BLDG #21716, FORT GORDON, GA 30905 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 340861632.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 423 22ND STREET BLDG #21515, BLDG #21716
- City
- FORT GORDON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30905
- Mailing
- 410 MCINTOSH ST., VIDALIA, GA 30474
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (J)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
90109020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not provide a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: Copper Construction Company - Fort Gordon Buildings 21715 and 21716 - Augusta, GA - The employer on-site did not identify hazards or provide effective information and SDS on the following hazardous chemicals to include, but are not limited to, Silica (~75%), Dust, Welding Fumes, Copper, and Propane at the facility. Employees of Fort Gordon were experiencing symptoms to include, but were not limited to headaches, sinus infections, throat irritation, and other respiratory problems while Cooper Construction contractors were above and adjacent to employees while welding and drilling through the concrete ceiling and walls of the building to install duct work for ventilation systems. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1101 E01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II, and III asbestos work was not conducted within regulated areas: Copper Construction Company - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or require a regulated area (warning signs) for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or require the use of a regulated area when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 E04
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(4): All persons entering a regulated area were not supplied with a respirator selected in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(2): Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or require respirators for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or require respirators when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 E06
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(6): The employer did not ensure that all asbestos work performed within regulated areas was supervised by a competent person: Copper Construction Company - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or require supervision by a competent person for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or require supervision by a competent person when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 F02 I
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace: Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not ensure that exposure monitoring was conducted in a timely manner for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not ensure that exposure monitoring was conducted when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 G01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1): The employer did not use engineering controls and work practices in all operations covered by 29 CFR 1926.1101, regardless of the levels of the exposure: Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or use engineering controls or work practice controls such as, but are not limited to wet methods, HEPA vacuum, or prompt cleanup/disposal for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or use engineering controls or work practice controls such as, but are not limited to wet methods, HEPA vacuum, or prompt cleanup/disposal when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 I01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1): The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced: Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or require personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or require the use of PPE when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.1101 K03 II
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(ii): Before work under this standard was performed, the employer did not inform employees of the location and quantity of ACM and/or PACM present in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area. Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not ensure that employees who performed construction (drilling) work of material that contained asbestos were informed of the location and quantity of ACM and/or PACM present in the area and the precautions needed to ensure that asbestos is confined to the area. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1101 K09 I
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,813 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not ensure participation in the asbestos training program by each employee who was likely to be exposed to asbestos in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), or for each employee engaged in Class I through Class IV asbestos operations: Copper Construction Company, Inc. - Fort Gordon, Buildings 21715 and 21716- Augusta, GA- The employer did not provide or require participation in an asbestos training program for employees potentially exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced. The employer did not provide or require participation in an asbestos training program when a required negative exposure assessment was not produced for employees drilling the concrete ceilings that contained asbestos. This Class III Asbestos Work Disturbance was done without Work Practice or Engineering Controls. This was most recently observed on or about March 2015 through April 2015.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2812.5
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Copper Construction Company, INC.
View Copper Construction Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340861632.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.