Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U-TEC CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of U-TEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 5701 SPALDING DRIVE, NORCROSS, GA 30092 (NAICS 237130). OSHA activity number 340874411.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U-Tec Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U-Tec Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5701 SPALDING DRIVE
City
NORCROSS
State
GA
ZIP
30092
Mailing
926 RIDGEDALE ROAD, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237130
Employees
270
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2016
Abate by
Feb 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.95(a): The employer did not ensure employees use appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates that need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees.    On or about August 19, 2015, at 5701 Spalding Drive, Norcross, Georgia, two employees performing light pole installation work near energized power lines were exposed to electrical shock hazards and one employee was injured when the employees did not use rubber gloves and dielectric overshoes when required based upon potential electrical exposure or use other compliant methods to eliminate hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    On or about August 19, 2015, while using a digger derrick to install light poles near energized power lines, the employer did not avoid exposure, by choice of location and lifting method, or take actions such as to de-energize and ground the power lines, maintain clearance to prevent encroachment, or as necessary, use warning methods, use a dedicated spotter in continuous communication with the operator when the digger derrick lifted a light pole for installation.    Among other methods, feasible abatement methods include maintaining safe distance from power lines and identifying a safe work zone or de-energizing lines.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.1408 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2016
Abate by
Feb 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1408(a)(2): 29 CFR 1926.1408(a)(2): The employer did not determine if any part of the equipment, load line or load (including rigging and lifting accessories), if operated up to the equipment's maximum working radius in the work zone, could get closer than 20 feet to a power line.  On or about August 19, 2015, at 5701 Spalding Drive, Norcross, Georgia:  Three employees performing light pole installation work were exposed to electrical shock hazards when the employer did not de-energize and ground the power line, did not maintain a 20-foot clearance to prevent encroachment, did not erect barricades, warning lines visible to the operator, or proximity alarms, and/or did not use a  dedicated spotter in continuous communication with the operator when the crane was operated near an energized power line of approximately 14,400 volts of electricity.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1408 G01 I F

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2016
Abate by
Feb 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1408(g)(1)(i)(F): The employer did not train employees to maintain a safe clearance distance from power lines:  On or about August 19, 2015, at 5701 Spalding Drive, Norcross, Georgia:  Three employees performing light pole installation work were exposed to electric shock hazards when the employer did not train the employee operating the crane in maintaining a safe clearance distance from energized overhead power lines.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View U-Tec Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340874411.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.