Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U-TEC CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of U-TEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 1 REINHARDT COLLEGE PARKWAY/100 RIVERSTONE TER., CANTON, GA 30114 (NAICS 237130). OSHA activity number 345328611.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U-Tec Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U-Tec Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 REINHARDT COLLEGE PARKWAY/100 RIVERSTONE TER.
City
CANTON
State
GA
ZIP
30114
Mailing
926 RIDGEDALE DRIVE, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237130
Employees
515
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.950 B01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2021
Abate by
Jan 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.950(b)(1)(i):Each employee was not trained in, and familiar with, the safety-related work practices, safety procedures, and other safety requirements in this subpart that pertain to his or her job assignments.  (a) Site, 1 Reinhardt Parkway/100 Riverstone Terrace, Canton, GA 30114: On or about May 25, 2021 and at times prior to, workers were exposed to thermal radiation burn hazards and amputation hazards, in that the employer did not provide training on the recognition of arc-flash hazards, the associated energies, the minimum approach distances, and the protective equipment for personnel working/standing in proximity of energized parts.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1926.952 A02

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2021
Abate by
Jan 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,922 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.952(a)(2): Briefing by the employee in charge. The employer  did not ensure that the employee in charge conducted a job briefing that met paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section with the employees involved before they start each job.  (a) Site, 1 Reinhardt College Parkway/100 Riverstone Terrace, Canton, GA 30114; On or about May 25, 2021 employees were exposed to burn hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that a job briefing was conducted before the start of each job performed at the 25 KV/14.4 KV pad-mount switchgear, identified with internal label GG6354.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $10922
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1926.960 C01 III

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2021
Abate by
Jan 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,922 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that no employee approaches or takes any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance, unless the measures outlined in 1926.960(c)(1)(iii)(A) - (C) were met:  (a) Site, 1 Reinhardt College Parkway/100 Riverstone Terrace, Canton, GA 30114; On or about May 25, 2021 and at times prior to, employees were exposed to burn hazards in that the employer did not ensure that minimum approach distances (MADs) for personnel and conductive objects were observed during work performed at the 25 KV/15 KV energized pad-mount switchgear GG6354.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $10922
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1926.960 G04

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2021
Abate by
Jan 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,922 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.960(g)(4):Flame-resistant clothing. The employer did not  ensure that the outer layer of clothing worn by an employee, except for clothing not required to be arc rated under paragraphs (g)(5)(i) through (g)(5)(v) of this section,  was flame resistant under any of the conditions specified under paragraphs g(4)(i) through g(4)(iii) of this section:.  (a) Site, 1Reinhardt College Parkway/100 Riverstone Terrace, Canton, GA 30114; On or about May 25, 2021 employees were exposed to burn   hazards in that the employer did not ensure that flame resistant clothing was in use while in proximity of work performed on energized parts.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $10922
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

View U-Tec Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345328611.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.