Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEO AGRICULTURE, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LEO AGRICULTURE, LLC. in W5370 CTY DR, MONROE, WI 53566 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 340887108.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LEO Agriculture, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LEO Agriculture, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
W5370 CTY DR
City
MONROE
State
WI
ZIP
53566
Mailing
W5370 CTY DR, MONROE, WI 53566
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2016
Abate by
Apr 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $440 · Current $440
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  The employer did not provide certification and documentation of abatement for citations issued for the following:  The employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards.  The metal conduit containing flexible wiring on the Bridgeport drill was broken.  Employees were not trained on physical and health hazards related to the chemicals they work with.  The mezzanine was not marked with the approved load design.   Employees were not provided with protective eyewear.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $440

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Feb 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace for employee exposure to welding fumes, manganese, chromium, hexavalent chromium, tungsten and nickel when thermal spraying knives with Stoody 87TG Tungsten Carbide Spray Powder.
Recent events (4)
  • — F $5432
  • — C $14253
  • — Z $14253

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Feb 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): Equipment with damaged parts that may adversely affect its safe operation or its mechanical strength, such as broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating parts shall not be used:   The metal conduit containing the flexible wiring to the Bridgeport drill press was broken, exposing and putting strain onto the flexible wiring inside.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1910.1200 H03 II

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Feb 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  Employees are not trained on the hazards of the Stoody 87TG Tungsten Carbide Spray Powder when thermal spraying the knives, including but not limited to, the hazards of welding fumes, manganese, hexavalent chromium, chromium, and nickel.  Leo Agriculture was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.1200(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 793362, citation number 1, item number 10 and was affirmed as a final order on 9/30/2013, with respect to a workplace located at W5370 Hwy DR, Monroe, WI 53566.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4400

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Feb 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.  a) The mezzanine space used for storage above the front office area was not marked with the approved load design.  b) The mezzanine space used for storage above the restroom, flammable storage area was not marked with approved load design.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 H01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2016
Abate by
Feb 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): The employer did not provide the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, at no cost to employees.  The employer did not provide protective eyewear to employees that are required to use the eyewear to comply with Subpart I.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View LEO Agriculture, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340887108.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.