HOPE HULL, AL —
OSHA Inspection: GENPAK, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GENPAK, LLC in 7621 BILL JOSEPH PARKWAY, HOPE HULL, AL 36043 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 340900513.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENPAK, LLC
- Site address
- 7621 BILL JOSEPH PARKWAY
- City
- HOPE HULL
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36043
- Mailing
- 7621 BILL JOSEPH PARKWAY, HOPE HULL, AL 36043
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 138
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a) Repelletizer #2; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to service and perform preventive maintenance following a procedure that had not been reviewed at least annually to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified. b) Thermoforming AL-1; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to service and perform preventive maintenance following a procedure that had not been reviewed at least annually to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: a) Repelletizer #2; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Repelletizer #2 together without all employees applying a personal lockout device on the energy control lockout point. a) Thermoforming AL-1; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Thermoforming AL-1 together without all employees applying a personal lockout device on the energy control lockout point.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $4,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: a) Warehouse; on or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around improperly stacked boxes as high as 20 feet that were damaged and routinely fell over.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4620
- — C (S) $6600
- — Z (S) $6600
1910.303 F04
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(4): Disconnecting means were not capable of accepting a lock in the open position. a) Repelletizer #2; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior, the employer exposed his employees to potentially hazardous conditions when allowed to perform Lockout/tagout or other tasks while using a damaged disconnecting device that was not replaced with a new lockable disconnect.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $7000
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.23 A02
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $22,000 · Current $15,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(2): Ladderway floor opening(s) or platform(s) were not guarded by a standard railing with standard toeboard(s) on all exposed sides (except at the entrance to opening) with passage through the railing either provided with a swinging gate or so offset that a person could walk directly into the opening: a) Extrusion department; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to a 12.10 feet fall hazard in that employees were allowed to walk in a platform with an unguarded portion in front of the access ladder when performing tasks such as verify the HVAC system. Genpak, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.23(a)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315194811 citation number 1 item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on June 2, 2011, with respect to a workplace located at 7621 Bill Joseph Parkway, Hope Hull, Al 36043
Recent events (3)
- — J (R) $15400
- — C (R) $22000
- — Z (R) $22000
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $38,500 · Current $38,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items (a) through (d) of this section: a) Repelletizer #2; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous energies (including electrical, pneumatic and hydraulic), caught-in and amputations hazards in that the machine specific lockout/tagout procedure did not adequately outline the procedural steps for placement, removal, transfer and verification of lockout or tagout devices to control all energy sources when employees perform service or maintenance on the on the Repelletizer #2 at the extrusion department. b) Thermoforming AL-1; On or about September 1, 2015 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous energies (including electrical, pneumatic), caught-in and amputations hazards in that the machine specific lockout/tagout procedure did not adequately outline the procedural steps for placement, removal, transfer and verification of lockout or tagout devices to control all energy sources when employees perform service or maintenance on the Thermoforming AL-1#2 at the Thermoforming department. Genpak, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 280226 citation number 1 item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 1, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 26 Republic Plaza Middletown, NY 10940.
Recent events (3)
- — J (R) $38500
- — C (R) $38500
- — Z (R) $38500
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours. a) Genpak: On June 18, 2015 and at times prior, the employer failed to notify the OSHA Area Office within 24 hours that an employee suffered an amputation after a work related accident.
Recent events (3)
- — J (O) $0
- — C (O) $1000
- — Z (O) $1000
More inspections at Genpak, LLC
View Genpak, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340900513.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.