Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GILSTER-MARY LEE CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GILSTER-MARY LEE CORPORATION in 111 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, CHESTER, IL 62233 (NAICS 311230). OSHA activity number 340948892.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gilster-Mary LEE Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gilster-Mary LEE Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
111 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
CHESTER
State
IL
ZIP
62233
Mailing
1037 STATE STREET, CHESTER, IL 62233
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311230
Employees
180
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    The employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the energy control procedure least annually (based on twelve-month intervals) to verify that the procedures are adequate and being properly applied.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3850
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer shall certify that the periodic inspections have been performed. The certification shall identify the machine or equipment on which the energy control procedure was being utilized, the date of the inspection, the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection.   The employer did not ensure periodic inspections included all the required information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2016
Abate by
May 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,500 · Current $3,850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    The employer did not provide training over the company's energy control program that could be understood by all employees. Spanish speaking employees were not trained to understand safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3850
  • — Z (S) $5500

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the following elements and actions and were not done in the following sequence:     Employees who performed servicing and maintenance on the following equipment were not required to:       (1) Turn off and shut down the machines,  (2) Physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,   (3) Affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device,  (4) Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.        On 9/18/15, an employee was working on the case sealer on line #7 and lockout was not performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Gilster-Mary LEE Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340948892.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.