FOGELSVILLE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: HOFFMAN MANUFACTURING, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HOFFMAN MANUFACTURING, INC. in 2010 SUNSET DRIVE, FOGELSVILLE, PA 18051 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 341097319.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOFFMAN MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Site address
- 2010 SUNSET DRIVE
- City
- FOGELSVILLE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18051
- Mailing
- 2010 SUNSET DRIVE, FOGELSVILLE, PA 18051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential crushing hazards: a. North end of shop - Employees operated a Hyster Forklift but the employer did not require employees use the installed seatbelt during operations, exposing employees to struck-by and tip-over hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards, are to utilize the installed restraint system in accordance with the current version of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B56.1, "Safety Standard for Powered Industrial Trucks," and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B56.1-2005, "Safety Standard for Low Lift and High Lift Trucks", Section 5.4.1 which requires that all operators read and follow the manufacturer's operator manual and abide by the safety rules and practices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) Facility Wide: Two exits were not clearly marked with an exit sign, on or about February 4, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a) North end of facility: The direction of travel to an exit was not immediately apparent and the exit sign was not visible. Signs were not posted along the exit access to direct employees to the exit, on or about February 4, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: a) Facility Wide: Employees were not provided training to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting, on or about February 4, 2016. ABATEMENT NOTE: By this date the employer must either correct the alleged violation or implement a Fire Safety Policy, as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and (b) which included the evacuation requirement of 29 CFR 1910.157(b).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: a) Production Area: An employee operating the ByGeorge machine was not required to wear eye or face protection where metal pieces and chips could fly towards the employees face, on or about February 24, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Painting Booth: Employees were required to wear 3M half face respirators with HEPA cartridges while painting and the employer did not implement a respiratory protection program, on or about February 4, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Painting Booth: employees were required to wear 3M half face respirators with HEPA cartridges while painting and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine respiratory function, on or about February 4, 2016. No abatement certification or documentation required
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Painting Booth: employees were required to wear 3M half face respirators with HEPA cartridges while painting and the employer did not require the employees to complete a fit test, on or about February 4, 2016. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator protection training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii): a) Painting Booth: employees were required to wear 3M half face respirators with HEPA cartridges while painting and the employer did not provide an adequate training program to employees, on or about February 4, 2016. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $832 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) Production Area: An employee operating the ByGeorge machine was exposed to possible lacerations from the spinning metal pieces that were being cut by the machine, on or about February 24, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $832
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,216 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: a) Production Area: An employee operating the ByGeorge machine was exposed to an unguarded shaft on the machine, on or about February 24, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1216
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,152 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a) Facility wide: Employees use various hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Cardinal and Interpon powder coatings, acetone, and hydraulic oil and the employer did not establish or implement a hazard communication program, on or about February 4, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1152
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section: a) Amada Pega punch press: A spray bottle containing hydraulic oil did not have a label identifying the contents of the bottle or the hazards of the chemical, on or about February 4, 2016. b) Press Brake Area: A spray bottle containing a clear liquid was mislabeled a Simple Green, on or about February 24, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Facility wide: Employees use various hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Cardinal and Interpon powder coatings, acetone, and hydraulic oil and the employer did not provide employees with information about the hazards of the chemicals in their area, the labeling requirements, and the specifics of the hazard communication program, on or about February 4, 2016. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Hoffman Manufacturing, INC.
View Hoffman Manufacturing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341097319.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.