AMESBURY, MA —
OSHA Inspection: WINDOW WOMAN OF NEW ENGLAND
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WINDOW WOMAN OF NEW ENGLAND in 44 R ELM STREET, AMESBURY, MA 01913 (NAICS 238150). OSHA activity number 341106367.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WINDOW WOMAN OF NEW ENGLAND
- Site address
- 44 R ELM STREET
- City
- AMESBURY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01913
- Mailing
- 44 R ELM STREET, AMESBURY, MA 01913
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238150
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, the employer did not implement a written respiratory plan for employees required to wear half face elastomeric respirators for protection against exposure to lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, the employer had not evaluated the employees potential exposure to lead while performing window refurbishing tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, employees were wearing half face elastomeric respirators for protection against lead without having medical evaluations to ensure employees could wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting face piece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used. Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2016, employees were required to wear half face elastomeric respirators for protection against lead exposure without a fit tests being performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, the employer had not provided training on the use of respirators for protection against lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, surfaces were not kept as free as practicable from lead dust with surface concentrations of 20.31 per 100 cm2 and 3.0155 per 100 cm2. Or in the alternative: 29 CFR 1926.62(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: Location: Shop On or about December 22, 2015, surfaces were not kept as free as practicable from lead dust with surface concentrations of 20.31 per 100 cm2 and 3.0155 per 100 cm2.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections at Window Woman of NEW England
View Window Woman of NEW England's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238150)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341106367.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.