Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AJ NEW CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AJ NEW CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR INC. in 59 BONAIR DR, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341112274.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AJ NEW Construction and Repair INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AJ NEW Construction and Repair INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
59 BONAIR DR
City
SAINT AUGUSTINE
State
FL
ZIP
32092
Mailing
1947 SUNRISE DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32246
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $5,390
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, the scaffold on the front of the house was constructed of framing grade lumber by a person not qualified in scaffold design, exposing employees to a 15 feet fall hazard.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, the interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room of the house was constructed of framing grade lumber by a person not qualified in scaffold design, exposing employees to a 16 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the front of the house, the scaffold platforms on the first and second level were 6 and 8 inches wide, exposing employees to 7 and 15 feet fall hazards.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, on the interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room, the platform was 8 inches wide, exposing employees to a 16 feet fall hazard
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the front of the house, the front of the scaffold platforms were at a minimum of 16 and 18 inches from the rounded working surface of the house, and no fall arrest systems were used, exposing employees to a 15 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the scaffold at the front of the house, the support posts did not have a firm foundation in that the 2-inch by 4-inch framing grade lumber post rested directly on disturbed dirt without base plates, mudsills, or other foundation, exposing employees to a collapse hazard and a 15 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the scaffold at the front of the house, the scaffold posts did not have cross-bracing to prevent swaying, exposing employees to a collapse and a 15 feet fall hazard.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, on the interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room, the scaffold posts did not have cross-bracing to prevent swaying, exposing employees to a 16 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the scaffold at the front of the house, the first level of the scaffold did not have a means of access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration, or by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, the 15 feet high scaffold at the front of the house was not erected by personnel supervised, trained, or selected by a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, the 16 feet high interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room was not erected by personnel supervised, trained, or selected by a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the second level platform of the scaffold at the front of the house, employees installing plywood were exposed to a 15 feet fall hazard in that there were no fall protection systems in use.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, on the interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room, employees installing framing were exposed to a 16 feet fall hazard in that there were no fall protection systems in use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the 15 feet high scaffold at the front of the house, employees installing plywood were not trained to recognize or minimize hazards associated with scaffold systems.  b.   On or about December 8, 2015, on the 16 feet high interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room, employees installing framing were not trained to recognize or minimize hazards associated with scaffold systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Apr 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, on the 15 feet high scaffold at the front of the house, the employee who erected the scaffold was not trained by a competent person in erecting and inspecting scaffold systems.  b.   On or about December 8 , 2015, on the 16 feet high interior scaffold facing the wall of the family room, the employees who erected the scaffold were not trained by a competent person in erecting and inspecting scaffold systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,390 · Current $5,390
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a.   On or about December 10, 2015, at the scaffold in front of the house, the side rails of the extension ladder used to access the upper platform did not extend 3 feet above the level of the platform, exposing employees to a 15 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5390
  • — Z (S) $5390

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2016
Abate by
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,780 · Current $6,560 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section:    a.   Employees installing framing and sheathing at elevations of six feet or more above the ground are not being protected from fall hazards by a fall protection system:    The employer fails to assure effective protection against falls as required by the standard, as demonstrated on December 10, 2015 in the following instances:        1.  On or about December 10, 2015, on the 8:12 pitch roof, an employee installing roof sheathing was exposed to a 21 feet fall hazard in that he was not protected by a fall protection system.        2.  On or about December 10, 2015, on the second floor of the house, employees installing framing were exposed to 12 feet fall hazards from unprotected edges of the second floor in that there were no guard rail installed around the openings to the foyer, family room, and dining rooms, and there were no other fall protection systems in use.    AJ New Construction and Repair, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1007334, citation number 01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on January 26, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 3805 Valverde Circle Jacksonville Florida.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6560
  • — Z (R) $10780

View AJ NEW Construction and Repair INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341112274.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.