Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KDC TRITECH LABORATORIES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KDC TRITECH LABORATORIES in 8825 SMITH'S MILL ROAD NORTH, NEW ALBANY, OH 43054 (NAICS 541380). OSHA activity number 341123297.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch KDC Tritech Laboratories — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KDC Tritech Laboratories is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8825 SMITH'S MILL ROAD NORTH
City
NEW ALBANY
State
OH
ZIP
43054
Mailing
8825 SMITH'S MILL ROAD NORTH, NEW ALBANY, OH 43054
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541380
Employees
780
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:  1.  A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure;   2.  Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking  and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy;    3.  Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them;    4.  Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures;       a. Located throughout the production department, lockout/tagout procedures did not include the required specific procedural information necessary for performing lockout/tagout.  The employees were exposed to the hazards associated with performing servicing and/or maintenance activities; which include, but not limited to, setting up, adjusting, inspecting, modifying, lubricating, cleaning, unjamming, making adjustment, tool changes, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C06 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.  a. On or about December 15, 2015, located in the production department, periodic inspections of energy control procedures had not been performed at least annually, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with servicing and maintenance activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): Machine or equipment shutdown. The machine or equipment shall be turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment. An orderly shutdown must be utilized to avoid any additional or increased hazard(s) to employees as a result of the equipment stoppage.  a. Located on Line 6 Terco machine, employees performed servicing and maintenance while the equipment was still in operation, thereby exposing the employees to the horizontal pneumatic ram of the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 20 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.   a.  Located in the maintenance shop, employees operated a Magna horizontal band saw, model number RF-712N, serial number 2010-06 that did not have guarding that extended the full length of the unused portion of the bi-metal cutting blade, thereby exposing the employees to an amputation hazard.   b.  Located in the maintenance shop, employees operated a Birmingaham, model number YCL-1440GK lathe, serial number 07015211, that did not have a guard over the lathe's chuck, thereby exposing employees to a caught-in hazard.    c. Located on Line 6 Terco machine, there was an opening in the guarding where caps entered the Terco machine that did not prevent employee exposure to the moving parts where the collet would press caps on to bottles, thereby exposing employees to an amputation and/or laceration hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Practices addressed in this standard. Employees shall be trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertain to their respective job assignments.  1.  Located throughout the facility, employees performed electrical work in panel boxes without having the required training for electrical work; thereby exposing employees to arc flash and/or electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed.  Note: Personal protective equipment requirements are contained in subpart I of this part.   a.  Located in the electrical panels throughout the facility, employees performed electrical work in live electrical cabinets while not being provided with the proper personal protective equipment to protect the employees from electrical shock and/or arc flash hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.   a.  On or about November 8, 2015, an employee was hospitalized after receiving burn injuries to the upper portion of the body.  The employer did not report the inpatient hospitalization to OSHA within 24 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3000
  • — Z (O) $5000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 780 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a.  Located throughout the facility, the employer did not certify written PPE hazard assessments with the required information while employees performed various tasks throughout the facility that necessitated the used of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 44 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings shall be effectively closed.    a.  Located at number 6 Filler electrical control cabinet, the employer did not ensure that an unused opening in a 208 volt electrical cabinet was effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View KDC Tritech Laboratories's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341123297.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.