Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DICKINSON FROZEN FOODS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of DICKINSON FROZEN FOODS, INC. in 903 E. 3000 NORTH, SUGAR CITY, ID 83448 (NAICS 311411). OSHA activity number 341243723.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dickinson Frozen Foods, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dickinson Frozen Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
903 E. 3000 NORTH
City
SUGAR CITY
State
ID
ZIP
83448
Mailing
903 E. 3000 NORTH, SUGAR CITY, ID 83448
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311411
Employees
225
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1): The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by the plan when  the employee was assigned initially to a job:    a) On or about December 1, 2015, in the workplace:  The employer did not review employee responsibilities under Section 15.1 of the emergency action plan with Maintenance employees with regards to ammonia releases.    Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.38 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(2): The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by the plan when  the employee's responsibilities under the plan change.  a) On or about December 1, 2015, in the workplace:  The employer did not review employee responsibilities during an ammonia release under Section 15.1 of the emergency action plan with employees that have been re-assigned to the maintenance department.   Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 578 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement pre-emergency planning and coordination with outside parties during anhydrous ammonia releases.    b) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement training and communication procedures during anhydrous ammonia releases.    c) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement emergency recognition and prevention procedures for anhydrous ammonia releases.    d) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement decontamination procedures during anhydrous ammonia releases.    e) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement critique of response and follow-up after anhydrous ammonia releases.    f) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto: the facility did not implement PPE and emergency equipment procedures during anhydrous ammonia releases.    Abatement documentation and certification required for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.120 Q10

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(10):  Chemical protective clothing and equipment to be used by organized and designated HAZMAT team members, or to be used by hazardous materials specialists, did not meet the requirements of paragraphs (g)(3) through (5) of this section.    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  The employer did not provide appropriate chemical protective gloves ammonia releases.  Maintenance Tech 1 and Generalists were required to participate in ammonia related emergency responses and had not received appropriate PPE.    b) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  The employer did not provide appropriate chemical protective boots ammonia releases.  Maintenance Tech 1 and Generalists were required to participate in ammonia related emergency responses and had not received appropriate PPE.    c) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  The employer did not provide appropriate chemical protective coveralls ammonia releases.  Maintenance Tech 1 and Generalists were required to participate in ammonia related emergency responses and had not received appropriate PPE.    Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.      a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  Maintenance employees responded to ammonia releases with full face cartridge respirators, but were not medically evaluated.  Ammonia releases have included the release from the Line B refrigeration system.    Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  Employees required to wear full face respirators for responding to ammonia releases were not fit tested.  Emergency responses have included the release of ammonia from the Line B refrigeration system.    Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q06

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6): Training was not based on the duties and function to be performed by each responder of an emergency response organization. The skill and knowledge levels required for all new responders, those hired after the effective date of this standard, was not conveyed to them through training before they are permitted to take part in actual emergency operations on an incident.    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  Maintenance employees responded to an ammonia release in the role of a Hazardous Materials Technician without proper emergency response training per 1910.120(q)(6)(iii).  The response to ammonia releases are required by Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc.    b) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  Maintenance employees responded to an ammonia release in the role of an Hazardous Materials Specialist without proper emergency response training per 1910.120(q)(6)(iv).  The response to ammonia releases are required by Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc.    c) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto:  Maintenance employees responded to an ammonia release in the role of an Incident Commander without proper emergency response training per 1910.120(q)(6)(v).  The response to ammonia releases are required by Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc.    Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $70000
  • — C (W) $70000
  • — Z (W) $70000

1910.120 Q03 II

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(ii): The individual in charge of the incident command system did not identify, to the extent possible, all hazardous substances or conditions present and did not address, as appropriate, site analysis, use of engineering controls, maximum exposure limits, hazardous substance handling procedures and the use of any new technologies:    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Tech 2 was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.      b) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Tech 1 was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       c) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Generalist was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       d) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Maintenance Manager was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (W) $70000
  • — Z (W) $70000

1910.120 Q03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard did not wear positive pressure self-contained breathing apparatus while engaged in emergency response, until such time that the individual in charge of the ICS determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection did not result in hazardous exposures to employees:    a) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Tech 2 was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.      b) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Tech 1 was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       c) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Generalist was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       d) On or about December 1, 2015, or prior thereto, in the Line B Compressor Room:  The Maintenance Manager was exposed to unknown levels of ammonia while wearing a full face cartridge respirator when responding to an ammonia leak.  Ammonia level measurements were not taken by employees during the response.       Abatement certification and documentation are required under this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

View Dickinson Frozen Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341243723.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.