Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FARMWELD INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FARMWELD INC. in 18413 E US HIGHWAY 40, TEUTOPOLIS, IL 62467 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 341317964.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Farmweld INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Farmweld INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FARMWELD INC.
Site address
18413 E US HIGHWAY 40
City
TEUTOPOLIS
State
IL
ZIP
62467
Mailing
18413 E US HIGHWAY 40, TEUTOPOLIS, IL 62467
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
46
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0731152016202610

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    In the steel area, the employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazard(s) from welding operations, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jun 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or weren't required to wear appropriate goggles when flameproof screens or shields were not used:    A.) In the stainless steel area, employees performed arc welding in the form of metal inert gas (MIG) and tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding and workers or other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or weren't required to wear appropriate goggles when flameproof screens or shields were not used.    B.) In the steel area, employees performed arc welding in the form of metal inert gas (MIG) welding and workers or other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or weren't required to wear appropriate goggles when flameproof screens or shields were not used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1820
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.252 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.252(c)(1)(iv): The employer did not include the potentially hazardous materials employed in fluxes, coatings, coverings, and filler metals, all of which are potentially used in welding and cutting, in the program established to comply with Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (sec. 1910.1200).    The employer did not include the potentially hazardous materials employed in fluxes, coatings, coverings and filler materials, all of which are potentially used in welding, and employees were exposed to hazardous materials such as but not limited to 308LSi Stainless Steel Welding Wire.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1026 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200:  The employer did not ensure that employees in the stainless steel shop, where there was exposure to chromium (VI), were provide with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2): 29CFR 1910.1026(l)(2): The employer did not ensure that employees could demonstrate knowledge of the contents of this section and the purpose of medical surveillance. In addition the employer did not make a copy of this section available without cost to all affected employees:  In the stainless steel shop where there was exposure to chromium (VI), the employer did not ensure that employees could demonstrate knowledge of the contents of this section and the purpose of medical surveillance. In addition the employer did not make a copy of this section available without cost to all affected employees
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 46 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  The employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals to employees throughout the facility at the time of their initial assignment and employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Citcool 33 Concentrate and compressed argon and carbon dioxide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    For stainless steel welding operations, the employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI) in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2) or (d)(3).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1026 K01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,275 Reduced

Hazardous substances 06890691

29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year:    The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all welders working in the stainless steel shop who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year. Employees were exposed to chromium (VI) during welding operations on stainless steel for an 8-hour time-weighted average of 4.0 micrograms per cubic meter and 3.0 micrograms per cubic meter, which is above the action limit of 2.5 micrograms per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2275
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):    The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 H05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $455 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(5): The employer did not pay for replacement PPE.    In the stainless steel and steel welding areas, the employer did not pay for replacement welding gloves when such gloves are required for protection against thermal skin burns.  The employer provided the first pair of welding gloves, but employees were required to purchase their own replacement pair after that.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $455
  • · Z (O) $700

View Farmweld INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341317964.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.