Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: HAIN PURE PROTEIN CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HAIN PURE PROTEIN CORPORATION in 304 SOUTH WATER STREET, NEW OXFORD, PA 17350 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 341376366.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hain Pure Protein Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hain Pure Protein Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
304 SOUTH WATER STREET
City
NEW OXFORD
State
PA
ZIP
17350
Mailing
P.O. BOX 38 304 SOUTH WATER STREET, NEW OXFORD, PA 17350
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311615
Employees
560
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - The employer did not ensure that a door  between the blast freezer and the  engine/ machinery room complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices in that the door was not tightly sealed, on or about April 5, 2016.     Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $7839

1910.119 E05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,880 · Current $5,292 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not assure that PHA recommendations were resolved in a timely manner:    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - The employer did not ensure that the 2014 PHA recommendation were resolved in a timely manner, on or about April 5, 2016.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5292
  • · Z (S) $5880

1910.119 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $11,224 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and addressing at least steps for each operating phase, safe operating limits, safety and health considerations, and safety systems and their functions as outlined by this paragraph:    (a) 304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - The employer did not develop a written inbound ammonia receiving procedure, on or about April 5, 2016.      No abatement certification or documentation required, corrected during the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $11224
  • · Z (S) $12471

1910.119 F01 III D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(D): The employer's process hazard analysis did not address quality control for raw materials and control of hazardous chemical inventory levels.    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - The process hazard analysis did not address the inbound receiving of ammonia and the associated hazards, on or about April 5, 2016.     Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7839

1910.119 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $11,224 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): Each employee presently involved in operating a process, and each employee before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, were not trained in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of this section. The training shall include emphasis on the specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks.    (a) 304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - Employees operate and maintain the ammonia system.  The employer did not ensure that employees were provide with training on the operating procedures, on or about April 4, 2016.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $11224
  • · Z (S) $12471

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Feb 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,799 · Current $8,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information on paragraph (d) of this section) in a safe and timely manner when necessary means where taken to assure safe operation.    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania -  The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment identified in a mechanical integrity inspection in a timely manner, on or about April 5, 2016.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $8820
  • · Z (S) $9799

1910.119 O05

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,880 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(5): The employer shall retain the two (2) most recent compliance audits.  (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - Compliance audits were completed in 2010 and 2014.  The employer did not retain the 2010 compliance audit, on or about April 5, 2016.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5880

1910.119 O04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,839 · Current $7,056 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(4): The employer did not promptly determine and document an appropriate response to each of the findings of the compliance audit, and document that deficiencies had been corrected:    (a) 304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania -   The employer did not promptly respond to each of the findings and correct the deficiencies found during the 2014 compliance audit, on or about April 5, 2016.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7056
  • · Z (S) $7839

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,998 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - Lights received power through extension cords.  The employer did not ensure that extension cords were not used as a substitute for fixed wiring, on or about April 5, 2016.    (b)   304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - A heat tracer tape received power through an extension cord.  The employer did not ensure that extension cords were not used as a substitute for fixed wiring, on or about April 5, 2016.    No abatement certification or documentation required, corrected during the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $4998

1910.119 J04 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,100 · Current $990 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer did not document each inspection and test that had been performed on process equipment.  The documentation did not identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test.    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania - Employees maintain a daily log book of inspections performed on equipment.  The employer did not ensure that the name of the person performing the inspection was documented, on or about April 5, 2016.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $990
  • · Z (O) $1100

1910.305 J01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Dec 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(iv): Fixtures installed in wet or damp locations were not approved for the purpose and were not so constructed or installed that water could not enter or accumulate in wireways, lampholders, or other electrical part.    (a)  304 South Water Street, New Oxford Pennsylvania- The employer did not ensure that electrical equipment in wet or damp locations were identified for the purpose, on or about April 5, 2016.      Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Hain Pure Protein Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341376366.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.