Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOOD HOPE CONTRACTING, CO. INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOOD HOPE CONTRACTING, CO. INC. in 3100 35TH STREET NORTH, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203 (NAICS 324121). OSHA activity number 341469856.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Good Hope Contracting, CO. INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Good Hope Contracting, CO. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3100 35TH STREET NORTH
City
BIRMINGHAM
State
AL
ZIP
35203
Mailing
3280 COUNTY RD. 437, CULLMAN, AL 35057
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324121
Employees
152
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,940 · Current $3,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to explosion hazards while welding on a tank that was full of flammable material such as liquid asphalt.     a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, an explosion occurred on a 30,000 gallon liquid asphalt tank while an employee was welding on the hatch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5940

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jul 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,940 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, an employee welding on a liquid asphalt tank was not provided adequate personal protective equipment, such as an apron or welding jacket, that could have prevented second degree burns to the torso, arms, and neck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5940

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jul 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, the employer did not conduct an adequate hazard assessment to address welding operations on liquid asphalt tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,940 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, employees performing maintenance and servicing were not provided procedures for locking and tagging out machinery and equipment, such as but not limited to, a 30,000 gallon liquid asphalt tank.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5940

1910.252 A02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jul 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,940 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(a)(2)(iv): The individual responsible for authorizing cutting or welding operations did not designate precautions to be followed in granting authorization to proceed preferably in the form of a written permit:    a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, the Welding Supervisor did not conduct an inspection of the area to be welded prior to allowing an employee to weld on the hatch of a 30,000 gallon liquid asphalt tank.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5940

1910.147 F03 II D

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $11,880 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:    a) On or about 05/03/2016 - Asphalt Plant #3, employees performing maintenance and servicing, (welding) did not place a lock at the control stations prior to accomplishing maintenance activities.    Good Hope Contracting Co., Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1068923, citation number 01, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on August 21, 2105, with respect to a workplace located at 624 East State Crusher Road, Falkville, AL 35622.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8000
  • — Z (R) $11880

View Good Hope Contracting, CO. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341469856.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.