Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL GUASCO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL GUASCO in 14 ACADEMY STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341490761.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Manuel Guasco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Guasco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MANUEL GUASCO
Site address
14 ACADEMY STREET
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03301
Mailing
50 WHITE STREET APT 3, HAVERHILL, MA 01830
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  a. Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer failed to have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:   a. Site- Employees were not protected from eye and head injuries where the employer failed to instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions while operating pneumatic nail guns and working underneath roofing activities where personal protective equipment was not worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from overhead struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:  a. Site- Employees using a Werner aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was set up on an uneven surface leaving the ladder leaning towards one side in a downward position.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  a. Site- Employees using a Werner aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was set up on an uneven surface leaving the ladder leaning towards one side with the right side rail having less support than the left side rail.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.28 A

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions:  a. Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require the wearing of eye protection.  Manuel Guasco dba MA Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard,  which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1104649, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on February 12, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at Prescott Street, Concord, NH 03301.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4400

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $6,160
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a. Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized.   Manuel Guasco dba MA Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard,  which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1104649, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on February 12, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at Prescott Street, Concord, NH 03301.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $6160

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $4,400
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a. Site- Employees working from the roof who were not protected from a fall hazard were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.  Manuel Guasco dba MA Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard,  which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1104649, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on February 12, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at Prescott Street, Concord, NH 03301.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4400

View Manuel Guasco's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341490761.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.