Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL GUASCO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL GUASCO in 27 LINLEW DRIVE, DERRY, NH 03038 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341641454.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Manuel Guasco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Guasco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MANUEL GUASCO
Site address
27 LINLEW DRIVE
City
DERRY
State
NH
ZIP
03038
Mailing
50 WHITE STREET APT. #3, HAVERHILL, MA 01830
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Abate by
Aug 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,487 · Current $5,487
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  (a) Jobsite - Employees were not protected from fall and struck-by hazards where the employer failed to have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5487

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,487 · Current $5,487
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) Jobsite - Employees were exposed to overhead hazards while working below the roofers with no hardhats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5487

1926.252 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.252(a): Whenever materials are dropped more than 20 feet to any point lying outside the exterior walls of the building, an enclosed chute of wood, or equivalent material, shall be used. For the purpose of this paragraph, an enclosed chute is a slide, closed in on all sides, through which material is moved from a high place to a lower one.  (a) Jobsite - Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while sheets of plywood were dropped from the roof. -
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,487 · Current $5,487
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee.  (a) Roof - Two employees were on a single anchor point.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5487

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, shall; be rigged such that an employee can neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level.  (a) Roof - Employees were exposed to a falls of more than six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.28 A

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,839 · Current $7,839
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.(  a) Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require the wearing of eye protection.  Manuel Guasco dba MA Construction, was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29CFR1926.28(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1104649, citation number 01, item number 02, and was affirmed as a final order on 02/12/16, with respect to a workplace located at Prescott Street, Concord, NH. 03301.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $7839

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,974 · Current $10,974
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a)  Roof - Employees were exposed to fall hazard of up to 30 feet while on a roof with no fall protection.   Manuel Guasco dba MA Construction, was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29CFR1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1104649, citation number 01, item number 03, and was affirmed as a final order on 02/12/16, with respect to a workplace located at Prescott Street, Concord, NHN. 03301.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $10974

View Manuel Guasco's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341641454.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.