Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPINCRAFT

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPINCRAFT in 500 IRON HORSE PARK, N BILLERICA, MA 01862 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341534105.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spincraft — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spincraft is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPINCRAFT
Site address
500 IRON HORSE PARK
City
N BILLERICA
State
MA
ZIP
01862
Mailing
500 IRON HORSE PARK, N BILLERICA, MA 01862
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.303 B07 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Abate by
Nov 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,451 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:    (a) Location - Quench area:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to properly close unused openings in an electrical box.     (b) Location - By Plasma cutter:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to properly close unused openings in an electrical box.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5451

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Abate by
Nov 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,998 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    (a) Location - Carnaghi machine:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer was powering a light in the Carnaghi machine vault with a flexible cord on a permanent basis.     (b) Location - Phoenix #2:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer was powering lights below the Phoenix 2 machine with flexible cords on a permanent basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4998

1910.333 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Abate by
Nov 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $8,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:    (a) Location - Facility:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that electrical safe work practices were used when employees entered electrical panels and motor control centers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8700
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.333 B02 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Abate by
Nov 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A): Safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment were not be determined before circuits or equipment are deenergized.  (a) Location - Facility:  On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to develop safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment before they were deenergized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Abate by
Nov 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $8,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:     (a) Location - Facility:    On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that personal protective equipment specific to electrical work was used when personnel enter electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8700
  • — Z (S) $12471

1910.184 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): Sling(s) that were damaged or defective were used:    (a) Location - In front of Carnaghi machine:  On or about 6/8/16, the employer failed to remove a defective sling from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Spincraft's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341534105.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.