Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CHITTENDEN LOCKS

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CHITTENDEN LOCKS in 3015 NW 54TH ST, SEATTLE, WA 98107 (NAICS 541330). OSHA activity number 341710630.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Chittenden Locks — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Chittenden Locks is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3015 NW 54TH ST
City
SEATTLE
State
WA
ZIP
98107
Mailing
3015 N W 54TH ST, SEATTLE, WA 98107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541330
Employees
54
Ownership type
D

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 D01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.  A)     In the machine shop, metal shop, and electrical shop, there were storage lofts that did not have their load rating visibly posted.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:   A)     The loft in the machine shop did not have guard rails installed in the area where items were stored.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  A)     The interior of the facility paint booth was used as permanent storage for tool chests, tables and other items, directly in the areas where spray finishing operations were taking place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  A) The respiratory protection analysis the Army Corps of Engineers performed for spray finishing operations at facility was outdated, and did not include all spray finishing operations that employees performed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 I01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that compressed air, compressed oxygen, liquid air, and liquid oxygen used for respiration met requirements for Grade D breathing air as described in the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification G-7.1-1989:  A)     The employer did not determine if the air used in the supplied air respirator system was grade D breathing air.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  A)     In the metal shop, there was a vertical band saw that did not have its blade guard lowered to the thickness of the stock being cut.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  A)     A bench grinder in the machine shop had its tongue guard one half inch from the surface of the grinding wheel.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  A)     In the mechanic break room, there was a re-locatable power tap that was used to power appliances.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 J01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2016
Abate by
Dec 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles may have no live parts normally exposed to employee contact. However, rosettes and cleat-type lampholders and receptacles located at least 2.44 m (8.0 ft) above the floor may have exposed terminals.  A) The light bars at the entrance to the main control tower were 7 feet 5 inches from the ground and were not protected from damage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Chittenden Locks's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341710630.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.