Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PAIUTE PALACE CASINO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PAIUTE PALACE CASINO in 2742 N. SIERRA HWY 395, BISHOP, CA 93514 (NAICS 713210). OSHA activity number 341891083.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paiute Palace Casino — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paiute Palace Casino is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2742 N. SIERRA HWY 395
City
BISHOP
State
CA
ZIP
93514
Mailing
2742 N. SIERRA HWY 395, BISHOP, CA 93514
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713210
Employees
142
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,089 · Current $3,057 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Anchoring fixed machinery.  Machines designed for a fixed location shall be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.     Maintenance Shop - On 10/12/16 in was noted that a Delta Shopmaster bench grinder was not secured to the work bench.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3057
  • — C (S) $4089
  • — Z (S) $4089

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,089 · Current $4,089
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:      Maintenance Shop - On 10/12/16 it was noted that a Delta Shopmaster Delta double wheeled bench grinder had a broken off work rest on the right side.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4089
  • — C (S) $4089
  • — Z (S) $4089

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch            Maintenance Shop - On 10/12/16 it was noted that a Delta Shopmaster Delta double wheeled bench grinder did not had a 3/8 inch measured gap between the tongue guard and the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,089 · Current $4,089
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A):   Flexible cords and cables were used for purposes prohibited by subparagraphs (a) through (f) of this paragraph.  In the following location, flexible cord was used in lieu of permanent wiring:   Maintenance Shop - A yellow extension cord was used to energize an air conditioning unit in a fixed location instead of using permanent wiring such as a wall outlet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4089
  • — C (S) $4089
  • — Z (S) $4089

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cords and cables were run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors:    Maintenance Shop - On 10/12/16 it was noted that a yellow flexible cord was run through external wall holes to energize an air conditioning unit.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $765 · Current $765
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.   Record Keeping - Noted on 09/09/16, the employer did not maintain OSHA 300 logs or 300A's for calendar years 2015, 2014, and 2013.  There have been recordable injuries in the last six months.   Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $765
  • — C (O) $765
  • — Z (O) $765

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   Maintenance Shop -  The employer has provided employees with personal protective equipment (PPE) such as ear muffs, ear plugs, gloves, and face shields to protect their hearing, eyes, skin, and extremities from hazards such as flying particles, noise, flash burn, and skin irritation when grinding surfaces, welding, whacking weeds or using chemical products.  The use of PPE is a job requirement.   A hazard assessment has not been performed to include the following elements:        1.  Select and have each affected employee use the types of PPE that will protect them from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment;  2.  Communicate the selection decisions to each affected employee and;  3.  Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.        *ABATEMENT NOTE:  The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:            Maintenance -  On 10/12/16 it was noted that the written hazard communication program was inadequate.  Employees use flammable liquids such as gasoline, spray paints, and paint thinner, latex paints, degreasers, as well as cleaning and landscaping products.   The following were missing from the program:         1. A complete collection of Safety Data Sheets;         2. A written training and information program for employees;        3. A description of the  labeling system that will be used in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Maintenance:  On 10/12/16 it was noted that employees use hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, flammable spray paints, thinners, gasoline, degreasers, bleach and disinfectants.   The employer has not provided the required information and training to an employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Paiute Palace Casino's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341891083.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.