Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ZENETEX LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of ZENETEX LLC in BUILDINGS 680 AND 674, HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UT 84056 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 341990778.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Zenetex LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Zenetex LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ZENETEX LLC
Site address
BUILDINGS 680 AND 674
City
HILL AIR FORCE BASE
State
UT
ZIP
84056
Mailing
2001 L STREET, SUITE 650, WASHINGTON, DC 20036
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488190
Employees
280
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $950 · Current $740 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard in the workplace:    (a)   Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard in the workplace.  Employees used pneumatic orbital sanders to remove corrosion and paint, including but not limited to "L04" paint, from aircraft or aircraft parts.  Employee exposure to air contaminants generated by the sanding was not determined.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.    (b)   Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard in the workplace.  Employees sprayed paint, including but not limited to "L04" paint, onto aircraft or aircraft parts.  Employee exposure to air contaminants generated by the painting was not determined.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $740
  • — Z (O) $950

1910.134 E06 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i):  The employer did not obtain from the PLHCP a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator:  (a)   Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer did not obtain from the PLHCP a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator.  Employees performed maintenance of aircraft.  Employees were required to wear respiratory protection when sanding or painting aircraft or aircraft parts.  The employer required employees to wear 3M models 6700, 6800, 6900, or 7800 full facepiece tight fitting air purifying respirators or 3M model H-410 hooded supplied air respirators.  The employer did not obtain from the PLHCP a written recommendation with regards to each employee's ability to use a respirator for all employees who were required to wear respirators.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Jun 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(6): QLFT may only be used to fit test negative pressure air-purifying respirators that must achieve a fit factor of 100 or less:    (a)   Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer did not ensure that QLFT was only used to fit test negative pressure air-purifying respirators that must achieve a fit factor of 100 or less.  Employees performed maintenance of aircraft.  Employees were required to wear respiratory protection when sanding aircraft.  Employees were provided 3M models 6700, 6800, 6900, or 7800 full facepiece tight fitting air purifying respirators.  Employees received qualitative fit tests using irritant smoke.  The employer did not ensure that wearers of full facepiece tight fitting air purifying respirators were provided quantitative fit tests.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, annual respirator training to employees who are required to use respirators:  (a)   Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, annual respirator training to employees who are required to use respirators.  Employees performed maintenance of aircraft.  Employees were required to wear respiratory protection when sanding or painting aircraft or aircraft parts.  The employer required employees to wear 3M models 6700, 6800, 6900, or 7800 full facepiece tight fitting air purifying respirators or 3M model H-410 hooded supplied air respirators.  The employer did not ensure that all employees were provided annual respirator training.  This condition potentially exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $950 · Current $740 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer, who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section, did not determine the 8 hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    (a)  Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16, the employer did not determine the 8 hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI).  Employees used pneumatic orbital sanders to remove corrosion and paint from aircraft.  The 602 paint contained strontium chromate and barium chromate.  Employee exposure to hexavalent chromium was not determined.  This condition potentially exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.    (b)  Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16, the employer did not determine the 8 hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI).  Employees painted aircraft or aircraft parts.  The 602 paint contained strontium chromate and barium chromate.  Employee exposure to hexavalent chromium was not determined.  This condition potentially exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $740
  • — Z (O) $950

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $950 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed, implemented or maintained at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    (a)  Zenetex LLC, at Buildings 680 and 674, Hill Air Force Base, UT: On and preceding 12/20/16,  the employer had not developed, implemented or maintained at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, and safety data sheets will be met.  Employees performed maintenance of aircraft.  The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program with regards to labeling and safety data sheets related to hazardous chemicals in their work area, including but not limited to the following:    1.  LO4 paint; and  2.  "602 Primer" (containing strontium chromate and barium chromate).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $720
  • — Z (O) $950

View Zenetex LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341990778.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.