COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: TOTAL ROOFING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TOTAL ROOFING LLC in 1350 CASCADE CREEK VIEW, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341995405.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TOTAL ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 1350 CASCADE CREEK VIEW
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80915
- Mailing
- 6125 STADIA CT, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: (a) On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (b) On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Adrian Marrufo dba Adrian Roofing Construction, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 9.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (c) On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (d) On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while descending in a wooden basket supported by a Genie GTH 1056 forklift, which was built for the purpose of removing materials, not hoisting personnel. (e) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (f) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Rebey Construction, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities. (g) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Carlos Fajardo, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities. (h) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Carlos Fajardo, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (i) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Ismael Vitales, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities. (j0) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (k) On or about December 22, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities. (l) On or about December 22, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while descending in a wooden basket supported by a Genie GTH 1056 forklift, which was built for the purpose of removing materials, not hoisting personnel. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
More inspections at Total Roofing LLC
View Total Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341995405.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.