Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TOTAL ROOFING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TOTAL ROOFING LLC in 1350 CASCADE CREEK VIEW, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341995405.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Total Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Total Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TOTAL ROOFING LLC
Site address
1350 CASCADE CREEK VIEW
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
80915
Mailing
6125 STADIA CT, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 11 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2017
Abate by
Feb 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person:     (a)  On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (b) On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Adrian Marrufo dba Adrian Roofing Construction, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 9.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (c)  On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (d)  On or about December 20, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while descending in a wooden basket supported by a Genie GTH 1056 forklift, which was built for the purpose of removing materials, not hoisting personnel.    (e) On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (f)  On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Rebey Construction, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities.    (g)  On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Carlos Fajardo, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities.    (h)  On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Carlos Fajardo, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (i)  On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Ismael Vitales, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls at approximately 18.0 feet and that the employees were wearing eye protection while operating pneumatic nail gun during roofing activities.    (j0)  On or about December 21, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (k)  On or about December 22, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Javier Mendoza, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while engaged in roofing activities.    (l)  On or about December 22, 2016, Total Roofing, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that the employees of Pedro Vasquez, roofing subcontractor, were protected from falls approximately 18.0 feet while descending in a wooden basket supported by a Genie GTH 1056 forklift, which was built for the purpose of removing materials, not hoisting personnel.    Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $12675
  • — Z (S) $12675

View Total Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341995405.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.