Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO GONZALEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO GONZALEZ in LOT 8 8311 NEMAIN LOOP, DUBLIN, OH 43016 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342075553.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Gonzalez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Gonzalez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANTONIO GONZALEZ
Site address
LOT 8 8311 NEMAIN LOOP
City
DUBLIN
State
OH
ZIP
43016
Mailing
1545 BYRD DRIVE LOT 28, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,183 · Current $4,183
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or before February 1, 2017, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a fall protection program, thereby exposing the employees to a 12 foot fall hazard.  b. On or before February 1, 2017, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a scaffolding program, thereby exposing the employees to a 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,183 · Current $4,183
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds shall be designed by a qualified person and shall be constructed and loaded in accordance with that design. Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of this section.  a. On or before February 1, 2017, where employees were working from scaffolding consisting of a pump jack, platform, and sawhorse, the scaffold was not designed by a qualified person, thereby exposing the employees to a 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,183 · Current $4,183
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers. Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.  a. On or before February 1, 2017, where employees were working from scaffolding consisting of a pump jack, platform, and sawhorse, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4183

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,366 · Current $8,366
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or before February 1, 2017, where employees were working from the roof of the house, the employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 12 foot fall hazard.  Antonio Gonzalez DBA Sanchez Siding Services, was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1148436, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on December 6, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 2982 Highland Woods Blvd., Lot #73 Blacklick, OH 43004 .
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8366

View Antonio Gonzalez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342075553.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.