Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE HOFFMAN COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of THE HOFFMAN COMPANY in 1306 LAREDO STREET, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 342140837.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Hoffman Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Hoffman Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
THE HOFFMAN COMPANY
Site address
1306 LAREDO STREET
City
CORPUS CHRISTI
State
TX
ZIP
78401
Mailing
P.O. BOX 893, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78403
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321999
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Abate by
Jul 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    On or about February 28, 2017, in the laminate shop, employees used an adhesive containing hazardous vapors. The employer did not conduct air monitoring to see if employees were over permissible exposure limits for time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,346 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      On or about February 28, 2017, in the finishing building, the employer did not have an employee who wears a respirator medical evaluated prior to the employee wearing a half-face respirator while staining wooden cabinets and doors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $4346

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about February 28, 2017, in the finishing building, the employer did not have an employee who wears a respirator fit-tested prior to the employee wearing a half-face respirator while staining wooden cabinets and doors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Abate by
Jul 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  On or about February 28, 2017, in the finishing building, an employee wore a half-face respirator and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Abate by
Jul 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:  On or about February 28, 2017, and at times prior thereto, at this location, employees locked out woodworking machinery, such as but not limited to, planers and jointers. The employer did not conduct a periodic review of their lockout/tag out program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  On or about February 28, 2017, at this location, employees operated a forklift without being evaluated at least every 3 years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2017
Abate by
Jul 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about February 28, 2017, in the finishing and the laminate buildings, employees used hazardous chemicals to make wooden cabinets using stains, lacquer retarders, and contact adhesive. The employer did not train these employees on hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View The Hoffman Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342140837.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.