MARYVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS RODRIGUEZ in 2718 DEERFIELD DR, MARYVILLE, IL 62062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342333424.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS RODRIGUEZ
- Site address
- 2718 DEERFIELD DR
- City
- MARYVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62062
- Mailing
- 1145 HODIAMONT APT. 3A, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA. b) For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. The employer did not ensure that employees using a pneumatic nail gun during shingle installation at heights of 9 feet and greater were equipped with appropriate safety glasses, thereby exposing employees to the hazard of flying particles.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of subsection 1926.502: The employer did not ensure that fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet or greater while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to the roof level of a residential structure of 9 feet and greater were extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface being accessed, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections at Luis Rodriguez
View Luis Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342333424.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.