Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS RODRIGUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS RODRIGUEZ in 2718 DEERFIELD DR, MARYVILLE, IL 62062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342333424.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Site address
2718 DEERFIELD DR
City
MARYVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62062
Mailing
1145 HODIAMONT APT. 3A, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63114
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  For Citation 1, Item 1, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)   For Citation 1, Item 2, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 6/21/2017 with an abatement date of 7/18/2017, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2017
Abate by
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  The employer did not ensure that employees using a pneumatic nail gun during shingle installation at heights of 9 feet and greater were equipped with appropriate safety glasses, thereby exposing employees to the hazard of flying particles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2017
Abate by
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of subsection 1926.502:  The employer did not ensure that fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet or greater while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2017
Abate by
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to the roof level of a residential structure of 9 feet and greater were extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface being accessed, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

View Luis Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342333424.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.