Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GARDEN VILLA HOTEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GARDEN VILLA HOTEL in 800 PALE SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 342753951.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Garden Villa Hotel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Garden Villa Hotel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GARDEN VILLA HOTEL
Site address
800 PALE SAN VITORES RD.
City
TAMUNING
State
GU
ZIP
96913
Mailing
800 PALE SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96913
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
42
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     Maintenance Department:  A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees required to don 3M negative pressure respirators (MD# 7502) to protect them against the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2307.9
  • — Z (S) $3297

1910.134 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness:     Maintenance Department:  A qualified program administrator was not designated to oversee an effective respiratory protection program for employees required to don negative pressure respirators to protect them from the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Maintenance Department:  Medical evaluations have not been performed for employees required to don negative pressure respirators to protect them from the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):      Maintenance Department:  Employees have been provided with and are required to don 3M negative pressure respirators (MD# 7502) to protect them against the health hazards associated with exposure to corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated and rendered inoperable.       Maintenance Department: The employer did not establish an energy control program that consists of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections for maintenance employees performing routine maintenance and service on various types on HVAC and electrical systems  Types of stored energy include, but are not limited to, mechanical, gravitational, hydraulic, and electrical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2307.9
  • — Z (S) $3297

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation.   Maintenance Department:  Employees were not trained by the employer to be authorized in LO/TO procedures.  Maintenance employees perform routine maintenance and repairs on HVAC and electrical systems and are potentially exposed to the unexpected release of energy types such as, but not limited to hydraulic, mechanical, gravitational, and electrical of various magnitudes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
Apr 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer's written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present.    Employees use flammable paints, thinners, fuels, chlorinated pool chemicals, and various cleaning products; a list of hazardous chemicals was not available.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2307.9
  • — Z (S) $3297

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
Apr 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:   The employer did not maintain updated safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals used by employees in the workplace.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:                      Maintenance and Housekeeping: Employees who used hazardous chemicals such as paints, thinners, various cleaning products, and corrosive Alkafoam were not trained on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new safety data sheet information.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Garden Villa Hotel's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342753951.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.