TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: GARDEN VILLA HOTEL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GARDEN VILLA HOTEL in 800 PALE SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 342753951.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GARDEN VILLA HOTEL
- Site address
- 800 PALE SAN VITORES RD.
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96913
- Mailing
- 800 PALE SAN VITORES RD., TAMUNING, GU 96913
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 42
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Maintenance Department: A written respiratory protection program was not established for employees required to don 3M negative pressure respirators (MD# 7502) to protect them against the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2307.9
- — Z (S) $3297
1910.134 C03
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer did not designate a program administrator who was qualified by appropriate training or experience to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and to conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness: Maintenance Department: A qualified program administrator was not designated to oversee an effective respiratory protection program for employees required to don negative pressure respirators to protect them from the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Maintenance Department: Medical evaluations have not been performed for employees required to don negative pressure respirators to protect them from the health hazards associated with corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Maintenance Department: Employees have been provided with and are required to don 3M negative pressure respirators (MD# 7502) to protect them against the health hazards associated with exposure to corrosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated and rendered inoperable. Maintenance Department: The employer did not establish an energy control program that consists of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections for maintenance employees performing routine maintenance and service on various types on HVAC and electrical systems Types of stored energy include, but are not limited to, mechanical, gravitational, hydraulic, and electrical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2307.9
- — Z (S) $3297
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation. Maintenance Department: Employees were not trained by the employer to be authorized in LO/TO procedures. Maintenance employees perform routine maintenance and repairs on HVAC and electrical systems and are potentially exposed to the unexpected release of energy types such as, but not limited to hydraulic, mechanical, gravitational, and electrical of various magnitudes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,297 · Current $2,308 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer's written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present. Employees use flammable paints, thinners, fuels, chlorinated pool chemicals, and various cleaning products; a list of hazardous chemicals was not available. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2307.9
- — Z (S) $3297
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: The employer did not maintain updated safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals used by employees in the workplace. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2018
- Abate by
- May 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: Maintenance and Housekeeping: Employees who used hazardous chemicals such as paints, thinners, various cleaning products, and corrosive Alkafoam were not trained on the new label elements (e.g., pictograms and signal words) and the new safety data sheet information. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Garden Villa Hotel
View Garden Villa Hotel's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342753951.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.