Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COOPER STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COOPER STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE INC. in 2378 STATE ROUTE 345 NE, NEW LEXINGTON, OH 43764 (NAICS 336399). OSHA activity number 342754850.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cooper Standard Automotive INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cooper Standard Automotive INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2378 STATE ROUTE 345 NE
City
NEW LEXINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43764
Mailing
P.O. BOX 650, NEW LEXINGTON, OH 43764
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336399
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 200 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,975 · Current $3,585 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes must be free and unobstructed. No materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route. The exit access must not go through a room that can be locked, such as a bathroom, to reach an exit or exit discharge, nor may it lead into a dead-end corridor. Stairs or a ramp must be provided where the exit route is not substantially level.    a. On or about November 6, 2017, multiple exit doors on the north wall of the building were obstructed by sand bags to prevent water from entering the building. The employer did not ensure that the exit routes were maintained free and unobstructed during plant operations for employees to be able to exit the building safely in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3585
  • — Z (S) $5975

1910.37 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 200 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2017
Abate by
Jan 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,975 · Current $3,585 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): Each exit route must be adequately lighted so that an employee with normal vision can see along the exit route.    a. On or about November 6, 2017, the employer did not ensure that all emergency egress lighting fixtures were functioning in order to provide adequate lighting for employees to exit the building safely in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3585
  • — Z (S) $5975

1910.37 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 200 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2017
Abate by
Jan 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign must be illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color. Self-luminous or electroluminescent signs that have a minimum luminance surface value of at least .06 footlamberts (0.21 cd/m2) are permitted.     a. On or about November 6, 2017, the employer did not ensure that all emergency exit signs were functioning in order to provide direction and lighting for employees to exit the building safely in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    a. On or about November 6, 2017, employees were operating an ENCO bandsaw in order to cut sections of brake line tubing for quality testing. The employer did not ensure that the guard was lowered to protect employees from the unused portion of the blade above the area where the saw was cutting the material, thereby exposing employees to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7605
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,975 · Current $3,585 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): Working space required by this standard may not be used for storage. When normally enclosed live parts are exposed for inspection or servicing, the working space, if in a passageway or general open space, shall be suitably guarded.   a. On or about November 6, 2017, the working space in front of the electrical panel A17 and disconnect SUB MDP3.3 located on the north wall at Mill number 1 was used to store several toolboxes for maintenance employees, therefore preventing employees from servicing and accessing the electrical equipment in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3585
  • — Z (S) $5975

View Cooper Standard Automotive INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342754850.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.