Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILK SPECIALTIES GLOBAL

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MILK SPECIALTIES GLOBAL in 248 EAST CHICAGO ROAD, WAUTOMA, WI 54982 (NAICS 311514). OSHA activity number 342820297.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Milk Specialties Global — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Milk Specialties Global is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
248 EAST CHICAGO ROAD
City
WAUTOMA
State
WI
ZIP
54982
Mailing
PO BOX 560, WAUTOMA, WI 54982
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311514
Employees
260
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $5,820 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1):  When information indicates that any employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer shall develop and implement a monitoring program:    On October 3, 2018, an employee working at the Bag Blow-off station of Line 7 was exposed to noise at an 8-hour dose of 235.9% which is an 8-hour TWA noise level equivalent of 96.2 dBA at the 80 dB threshold. The employer was made aware of the personal exposure level on or about October 30, 2017. On or about December 5, 2017, the employer had not developed or implemented a monitoring program to determine noise exposure levels for employees working on Line 7.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5820.3
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.95 D01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1)(i):  The sampling strategy shall be designed to identify employees for inclusion in the hearing conservation program and to enable the proper selection of hearing protectors:  On October 3, 2018, noise sampling conducted on Line 7 was not designed to identify employees for inclusion in a hearing conservation program or to enable the proper selection of hearing protectors. Sampling was conducted with one noise dosimeter (on a crew of typically seven to eight employees) on an employee who was directed by the employer to remain at the Bag Blow-off station for the full-shift instead of following the typical work station rotation schedule.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 D01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1)(ii):  Where circumstances such as high worker mobility, significant variations in sound level, or a significant component of impulse noise make area monitoring generally inappropriate, the employer shall use representative personal sampling to comply with the monitoring requirements of this paragraph unless the employer can show that area sampling produces equivalent results:  On October 3, 2018, where circumstances, including but not limited to, high worker mobility made area monitoring generally inappropriate, the employer did not collect representative personal sampling to comply with the monitoring requirements of this paragraph. Line 7 consisted of a crew of typically seven to eight employees who rotated through work stations on a daily basis. The noise sampling collected at the Bag Blow-off station of Line 7 was not representative and did not account for worker's mobility through the work stations of Line 7.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,183 · Current $3,110 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling:    On or about December 11, 2017, a metallic outlet box (handy box), located on the floor between the bag sealers and Bag Blow-off station conveyor in the northeast corner of the bag filling area of Line 7, was not installed in accordance with the UL identifier QCIT which states that boxes shall be mounted in or on a surface. The handy box was connected to a flexible cord and used as an extension cord to power the bag sealer and scale.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3109.8
  • — Z (S) $5183

View Milk Specialties Global's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342820297.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.