MACON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ASPEN PRODUCTS INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ASPEN PRODUCTS INC. in 3220 AVONDALE MILL ROAD, MACON, GA 31206 (NAICS 322212). OSHA activity number 342937307.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ASPEN PRODUCTS INC.
- Site address
- 3220 AVONDALE MILL ROAD
- City
- MACON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31206
- Mailing
- 3220 AVONDALE MILL RD., MACON, GA 31206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322212
- Employees
- 221
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- May 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $10,163 · Current $7,114 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of machine operator were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a hearing conservation program. On February 08, 2018 two machine operators were monitored for 470 minutes resulting in time weighted average exposures of 91.4 dBA and 91.9 dBA or equivalently doses of 121.8 % and 130.6% respectively for the 80 dBA threshold. b. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of packer were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a hearing conservation program. On February 08, 2018 a packer was monitored for 472 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 90.7 dBA or equivalently a dose of 110.7% for the 80 dBA threshold. c. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of inspector were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a hearing conservation program. On February 08, 2018 an inspector was monitored for 473 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 89.3 dBA or equivalently a dose of 92.02% for the 80 dBA threshold. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7114
- — Z (S) $10163
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- May 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of machine operator were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. On February 08, 2018 two machine operators were monitored for 470 minutes resulting in time weighted average exposures of 91.4 dBA and 91.9 dBA or equivalently doses of 121.8 % and 130.6% respectively for the 80 dBA threshold. b. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of packer were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. On February 08, 2018 a packer was monitored for 472 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 90.7 dBA or equivalently a dose of 110.7% for the 80 dBA threshold. c. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of inspector were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program. On February 08, 2018 an inspector was monitored for 473 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 89.3 dBA or equivalently a dose of 92.02% for the 80 dBA threshold. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- May 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of machine operator were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute an audiometric testing program. On February 08, 2018 two machine operators were monitored for 470 minutes resulting in time weighted average exposures of 91.4 dBA and 91.9 dBA or equivalently doses of 121.8 % and 130.6% respectively for the 80 dBA threshold. b. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of packer were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute an audiometric testing program. On February 08, 2018 a packer was monitored for 472 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 90.7 dBA or equivalently a dose of 110.7% for the 80 dBA threshold. c. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of inspector were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute an audiometric testing program. On February 08, 2018 an inspector was monitored for 473 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 89.3 dBA or equivalently a dose of 92.02% for the 80 dBA threshold. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- May 29, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of machine operator were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute a training program. On February 08, 2018 two machine operators were monitored for 470 minutes resulting in time weighted average exposures of 91.4 dBA and 91.9 dBA or equivalently doses of 121.8 % and 130.6% respectively for the 80 dBA threshold. b. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of packer were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute a training program. On February 08, 2018 a packer was monitored for 472 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 90.7 dBA or equivalently a dose of 110.7% for the 80 dBA threshold. c. On or about February 08, 2018 employees acting in the capacity of inspector were exposed to noise hazards where the employer did not institute a training program. On February 08, 2018 an inspector was monitored for 473 minutes resulting in a time weighted average exposure of 89.3 dBA or equivalently a dose of 92.02% for the 80 dBA threshold. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Aspen Products INC.
View Aspen Products INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322212)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342937307.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.