Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FERNANDO LOPEZ in 7575 CHAUCER PLACE, GARLAND, TX 75041 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342945342.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fernando Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fernando Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FERNANDO LOPEZ
Site address
7575 CHAUCER PLACE
City
GARLAND
State
TX
ZIP
75041
Mailing
3918 ROANOKE DRIVE, GARLAND, TX 75041
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,108 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a)  On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working in areas where overhead hazards existed without the use of head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,108 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:     a) On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential construction site where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using pneumatic nail guns to secure shingles without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502:     a)  On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential home, where employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than six (6) feet while performing roofing activities without the use of a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1552
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was notprovided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   a)     On or about February 13, 2018, at the multi-family residential site, where employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an extension ladder that did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing and was not equipped with a grab rail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

View Fernando Lopez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342945342.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.