Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUCK CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BUCK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. in THE HARTFORD APARTMENTS, 167 CLINTON ROAD, NEW HARTFORD, NY 13413 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343040424.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buck Construction, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buck Construction, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
THE HARTFORD APARTMENTS, 167 CLINTON ROAD
City
NEW HARTFORD
State
NY
ZIP
13413
Mailing
105 MAIN STREET, WHITESBORO, NY 13492
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.153 O

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,309 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.153(o): When damage to LP-Gas systems from vehicular traffic was a possibility, precautions against such damage were not taken:       a) Northeast corner of building, on or about 3-23-18:  Construction vehicles and motor vehicles were being operated immediately adjacent to a 100 gallon Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) tank that was not protected against accidental contact from vehicular traffic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4308.55
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,363 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:       a) Fourth floor, elevator shaft area, on or about 3-23-18:  Employees were operating various hand held power tools that were plugged into a receptacle box that was not being used as "listed and labeled", in that it was not used as designed or for its intended purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3363.1
  • — Z (S) $5174

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    a) Third floor, elevator shaft area, on or about 3-23-18:  Employees were operating various hand held power tools that were plugged into multiple receptacle boxes that did not have a continuous path to ground due to improper internal wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    a) Fourth floor, elevator shaft area, on or about 3-23-18:  Employees were operating various hand held power tools that were plugged into a receptacle box that exhibited broken strain relief on the two cords connected to the box.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself:       a) South side of building, fourth floor, on or about 3-23-18:  One employee was installing flat roof trusses while using a snap hook connected directly to a safety rope.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4203.55
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.502 D06 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(iii): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached:    a) South end of building, fourth floor, on or about 3-23-18:  Two employees were installing flat roof trusses, each with their snap hooks engaged to a single D-ring to which another connector was attached.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:    a) North and south walls of building, fourth floor top plates, on or about 3-23-18:  Two employees were installing flat roof trusses while connected to safety ropes that were rigged with excess slack, such that the employees could fall more than 6 feet, exposing the employees to a minimum fall hazard of 13 feet 4 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iv): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, did not bring an employee to a complete stop and/or and did not limit maximum deceleration distance to 3.5 feet (1.07 m):    a) North and south walls of building, fourth floor top plates, on or about 3-23-18:  Two employees were installing flat roof trusses while connected to safety ropes that were rigged with excess slack, such that the deceleration distance was greater than 3.5 feet, exposing the employees to a minimum fall hazard of 13 feet 4 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used:    a) Entire roof area, on or about 3-23-18:  Employees were working in and on flat roof trusses without training by a competent person in the proper use personal fall arrest systems.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:       a) Entire fourth floor, on or about 3-23-18 and 3-27-18:  Employees were using step ladders to access roof trusses that were not 3 feet above the landing surface, in that the top of the ladders were 44 inches below the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 8 feet up to 11 feet 8 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4203.55
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    a) Entire fourth floor, on or about 3-23-18 and 3-27-18:  Employees used the top step and top platform of step ladders for access to roof trusses, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 8 feet up to 11 feet 8 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $18,108 · Current $11,665 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:       a) Roof area, center of building, on or about 3-23-18:  Two employees were working while standing in/on flat roof trusses without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 11feet 8 inches.       BUCK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OR A SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, 1926.501(b)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1197066, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 002, ISSUED ON 1-13-17, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT DELTA LUXURY APARTMENTS, 7801 MERRICK ROAD, ROME, NY 13440.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $11665.2
  • — Z (R) $18108

1926.1052 C01 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $10,347 · Current $6,726 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:        a) East end of building, first through fourth floors, on or about 3-23-17:  Employees were using a stairway without a hand rail, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.       BUCK CONSTRUCTION, LLC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OR A SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1072679, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 001, ISSUED ON 6-26-15, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 226 GENESEE STREET, UTICA, NY 13502.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6725.55
  • — Z (R) $10347

View Buck Construction, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343040424.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.