Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALBANY RUST PROOFING, INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALBANY RUST PROOFING, INC in 1114 CENTRAL AVE, ALBANY, NY 12205 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343078531.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Albany Rust Proofing, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Albany Rust Proofing, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1114 CENTRAL AVE
City
ALBANY
State
NY
ZIP
12205
Mailing
1114 CENTRAL AVE, ALBANY, NY 12205
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Resin Clear and Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Isocynate during bed liner spraying. The Rhino product contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and Polyether Polyol.  The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection program for the employees required to don a supplied air respirator.   b).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying          tasks. The employer did not develop and implement a respiratory protection          program for the employees required to don an R95 on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.      a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Resin Clear and Rhino Hybrid 21-60          Isocynate during bed liner spraying. The Rhino product contains          chemicals such as, but not limited to, Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and Polyether Polyol. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the employees required to don a supplied air respirator.     b).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying           tasks. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the employees required to don an R95 on a daily basis.                       .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying          tasks. Employees are required to don an R95 on a daily basis. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection          program to include a fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Resin Clear and Rhino Hybrid 21-60         Isocynate during bed liner spraying. The task is dependent on customer needs. The Rhino product contains         chemicals such as, but not limited to, Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and Polyether Polyol. Employees are         required to don a supplied air respirator. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection training.   b).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying          tasks. Employees are required to don an R95 on a daily basis. The employer did not provide a respiratory protection         training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,879 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying          tasks. Employees are required to don an R95 on a daily basis. The hazard associated with using the Z Guard is         organic vapors. The R95 provided to employees does not protect against organic vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3879

1910.134 I01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii): The Employer did not ensure that compressed breathing air met at least the requirements for Grade D breathing air described in ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification for Air, G-7.1-1989, to include:   (A): Oxygen content (v/v) of 19.5-23.5%;   (B): Hydrocarbon (condensed) content of 5 milligrams per cubic meter of air or less;   (C): Carbon monoxide (CO) content of 10 ppm or less;   (D): Carbon dioxide content of 1,000 ppm or less; and   (E): Lack of noticeable odor.    a) On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees required to don a supplied air hood when spraying bed liners. The employer did not test the air to make sure it comply with Grade D air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5432.4
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Nov 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Resin Clear and Rhino Hybrid 21-60         Isocyanate during bed liner spraying. The Rhino product contains chemicals such as, but not limited to,          Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and Polyether Polyol. These chemicals are corrosive to the skin and are         sensitizing to the skin. The employer did not provide a hazard communication program to include a written program         and training.   b).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying          tasks. Z-Gard Clear Sealant contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, mineral spirits. This chemical causes skin         and eye irritation. The employer did not provide a hazard communication program to include a written program         and training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2018
Abate by
Oct 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      a).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Rhino Hybrid 21-60 Resin Clear and Rhino Hybrid 21-60          Isocyanate during bed liner spraying. The Rhino product contains chemicals such as, but not limited to,           Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate (MDI) and Polyether Polyol. These chemicals are corrosive to the skin and are          sensitizing to the skin. The employer did not provide a hazard communication training.     b).    On or about 4/11/18, on site, for employees handling Z Guard Clear Sealant when conducting undercoat spraying           tasks. Z-Gard Clear Sealant contains chemicals such as, but not limited to, mineral spirits. This chemical causes skin          and eye irritation. The employer did not provide a hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $0

View Albany Rust Proofing, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343078531.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.