Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KENYON INTERNATIONAL INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KENYON INTERNATIONAL INC. in 8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925, CLINTON, CT 06413 (NAICS 335210). OSHA activity number 343307823.

Watch Kenyon International INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kenyon International INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925
City
CLINTON
State
CT
ZIP
06413
Mailing
8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925, CLINTON, CT 06413
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
335210
Employees
45
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $6467.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a site specific hazardous energy control lockout/tagout program consisting of machine specific step-by-step written energy control procedures and training for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented step-by-step hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures in the machine specific, including alternative measures for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  WORKSHOP:   The employees, as "affected and other" types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $5174.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  WORKSHOP:  The performance of the powered industrial truck operators was not evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  WORKSHOP:The employer did not ensure through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

EDIC

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343307823.