Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: KENYON INTERNATIONAL INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KENYON INTERNATIONAL INC. in 8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925, CLINTON, CT 06413 (NAICS 335210). OSHA activity number 343307823.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kenyon International INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kenyon International INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925
City
CLINTON
State
CT
ZIP
06413
Mailing
8 HERITAGE PARK ROAD PO BOX 925, CLINTON, CT 06413
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
335210
Employees
45
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a site specific hazardous energy control lockout/tagout program consisting of machine specific step-by-step written energy control procedures and training for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented step-by-step hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures in the machine specific, including alternative measures for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  WORKSHOP:   The employees, as "affected and other" types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the press brakes and turrets.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  WORKSHOP:  The performance of the powered industrial truck operators was not evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $5174

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  WORKSHOP:The employer did not ensure through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343307823.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.