Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEMPER FI ROOFING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEMPER FI ROOFING, INC. in S47 W25715 WOOD LILLY LANE, WAUKESHA, WI 53189 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343433801.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Semper FI Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Semper FI Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
S47 W25715 WOOD LILLY LANE
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53189
Mailing
S92 W27825 NATIONAL AVE., MUKWONAGO, WI 53149
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    (a) Employees were not wearing protective helmets while working below a lower level where tear off working was being performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2956

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,596 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     (a) Employees conducting roofing activities (tear off) on a low slope  roof were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2596
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.     (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to fall hazards had been trained to recognize fall hazards and implement fall protection when conducting roofing work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.     (a) The employer did not ensure that a ladder used for access was at least (3) feet above the landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.    (a) Non-self supporting ladder was being used at an angle that was greater than one quarter of the working length of the ladder on the lower level of the house.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level.    (a) A ladder being used as a means of access and egress from the second level to the first level of a two story residential house was not secured while on a unstable or level surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2018
Abate by
Oct 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to hazards of ladders had been trained to recognize those hazards and implement corrective actions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Semper FI Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343433801.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.