Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILSPRAY MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MILSPRAY MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES in 206 JOHN P SABLAN ST. YIGO, YIGO, GU 96929 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 343578506.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Milspray Military Technologies — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Milspray Military Technologies is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
206 JOHN P SABLAN ST. YIGO
City
YIGO
State
GU
ZIP
96929
Mailing
845 TOWBIN AVE., LAKEWOOD, NJ 08701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488190
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,763 · Current $4,734 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  On October 25, 2018, inside fabric tension shelters, the employer did not ensure that employees wearing negative pressure full-face respirators, were clean shaven to prevent facial hair from breaking the sealing surface between the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4734.1
  • — Z (S) $6763

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,381 · Current $2,367 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of particulates not otherwise regulated (PNOR) total dust listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15.00 milligrams per cubic meter mg/m3:    On December 6, 2018, inside spray booth #2: An employee engaged in sanding aircraft components was exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) total dust levels in excess of the OSHA PEL of 15.00 milligrams per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2366.7
  • — Z (S) $3381

1910.1026 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,508 · Current $3,156 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(c): Employees were exposed to an airborne concentration of chromium (VI) which exceeded 0.005 milligrams per cubic meter of air, as an 8-hour time-weighted average:  On December 6, 2018, Left side bunker prep booth #1: An employee prepping, priming and painting aircraft components was exposed to Chromium (VI) in excess of the OSHA PEL of 0.005 milligrams per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3155.6
  • — Z (S) $4508

1910.1026 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(f)(1)(i): Feasible engineering controls and work practices were not instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to chromium (VI) at or below the permissible exposure limit:  On December 6, 2018, Left side bunker prep booth #1: An employee prepping, priming and painting aircraft components was exposed Chromium (VI) in excess of the OSHA PEL of 0.005 milligrams per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1027 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,508 · Current $3,156 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1027(c): "Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)." The employer shall assure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of cadmium in excess of five micrograms per cubic meter of air (5 ug/m(3)), calculated as an eight-hour time-weighted average exposure (TWA).  On December 6, 2018, inside spray booth #2: An employee engaged in sanding aircraft components was exposed to Cadmium in excess of the OSHA PEL of 5 ug/m(3) micrograms per cubic meter calculated as an eight-hour TWA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3155.6
  • — Z (S) $4508

1910.1027 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances C141

29 CFR 1910.1027(f)(1)(i): Except as specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(ii), (iii) and (iv) of this section the employer shall implement engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to cadmium at or below the PEL, except to the extent that the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible.  On December 6, 2018, inside spray booth #2: An employee engaged in sanding aircraft components was exposed to Cadmium in excess of the OSHA PEL of 5 ug/m(3) micrograms per cubic meter calculated as an eight-hour TWA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Milspray Military Technologies's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343578506.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.