KANKAKEE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ELITE LABOR SERVICES, LTD.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of ELITE LABOR SERVICES, LTD. in RIVER VALLEY RECYCLING, LLC 288 WEST SOUTH TEC DRIVE, KANKAKEE, IL 60901 (NAICS 561320). OSHA activity number 343702304.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELITE LABOR SERVICES, LTD.
- Site address
- RIVER VALLEY RECYCLING, LLC 288 WEST SOUTH TEC DRIVE
- City
- KANKAKEE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60901
- Mailing
- 1400 W. HUBBARD STREET SUITE 200, CHICAGO, IL 60642
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561320
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 K03
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,267 · Current $13,267
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3): The employer did not ensure that each employee is informed of the requirements of this subsection: a. On or before January 10, 2019, the employer had not informed employees exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels of the elements of this subsection.
Recent events (3)
- — C (O) $13267
- — F (O) $13267
- — Z (O) $13267
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,251 · Current $3,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. On or about January 9, 2019, in the Didion Room, employees were required to wear tight fitting negative pressure full face respirators. The employer failed to ensure that the employees required to wear the respiratory protection had been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3750
- — Z (S) $6251
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were fit tested prior to the initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter: a. On or about January 9, 2019, in the Didion Room, employees were required to wear tight fitting negative pressure full face respirators. The employer failed to ensure that the employees required to wear the respiratory protection had been provided with either an initial use fit test or had received an annual fit test, accordingly.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a. On or about January 9, 2019, in the Didion Room, employees were required to wear tight fitting negative pressure full face respirators. The employer failed to ensure that the employees required to wear the respiratory protection had been provided with training which included but was not limited to proper fit, usage and maintenance of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $10,419 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a. On or about January 9, 2019, in the facility, employees were exposed to lead when processing radiators and sorting metal(s). The employer failed to provide employees with the information contained in Appendix A and B of the lead standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $10419
1910.95 G05 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $41,674 · Current $13,267 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared: a. On or about January 10, 2019, the employer had not established a vail baseline audiogram for employees against which subsequent audiograms can be compared within six months of the employees' exposure to noise at or above the action level.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $13267
- — C (R) $41674
- — Z (R) $41674
More inspections at Elite Labor Services, LTD.
View Elite Labor Services, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561320)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343702304.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.