Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOE CAPASSO MASON ENTERPRISES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JOE CAPASSO MASON ENTERPRISES, INC. in 10 SCHOOL STREET, ROCKY HILL, CT 06067 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343767448.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JOE Capasso Mason Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOE Capasso Mason Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 SCHOOL STREET
City
ROCKY HILL
State
CT
ZIP
06067
Mailing
251 MIDDLE STREET, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Inside construction of school building:    On or about 2/7/19, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear respiratory protection when using a powered angle grinder on mortar indoors, per Table 1 of the respirable crystalline silica in construction standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4000
  • — C (S) $5304
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Inside construction of school building:    On or about 2/7/19, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing to employees that were required to wear respiratory protection per Table 1 of the respirable crystalline silica in construction standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4000
  • — C (S) $6630
  • — Z (S) $6630

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Indoor school building construction:    On or about 2/7/19, the employer did not provide respirator training to employees that were required to wear respiratory protection per Table 1 of the respirable crystalline silica in construction standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4000
  • — C (S) $6630
  • — Z (S) $6630

1926.1153 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    Inside construction of school building:     On or about 2/7/19, the employer had not implemented the required controls identified on Table 1 for employees using a hand grinder on mortar between concrete blocks. Table 1 requires a dust collector to be attached to the hand grinder to control the dust and requires that all employees engaged in the task wear APF 10 respiratory protection, when performing this task indoors.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4000
  • — C (S) $6630
  • — Z (S) $6630

1926.1153 D02 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 23 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:    Inside construction of school building:    On or about 2/7/19, the employer had not assessed the exposure of employees in two instances:  1. Employee was using a grinder on mortar between concrete blocks.  2. Employees use hand grinding stones and grinding stones on poles to smooth the mortar and cinder blocks prior to painting.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 23 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the information contained in paragraphs (i)(2)(i)(A)-(i)(2)(i)(F) of this standard.     Inside construction of school building:    On or about 2/7/19, the employer had not trained employees on the health hazards of crystalline silica, potential sources of exposures of and how to control exposure. The employees were using both powered grinders and hand grinding stones to smooth the surface of cement blocks and mortar containing crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4000
  • — C (S) $6630
  • — Z (S) $6630

View JOE Capasso Mason Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343767448.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.