Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO YANEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANTONIO YANEZ in 715 EAST UNION, LITCHFIELD, IL 62056 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343811899.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Yanez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Yanez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANTONIO YANEZ
Site address
715 EAST UNION
City
LITCHFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62056
Mailing
157 RIES ROAD, BALLWIN, MO 63021
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2019
Abate by
Jul 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 1b issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  c)  For Citation 1, Item 2 issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2019
Abate by
Jul 26, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  For Citation 2, Item 1 issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not provide documents demonstrating the complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,126 · Current $3,126
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3126

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to the hazard of falling during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2500

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $21,879 · Current $21,879
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately twenty-three (23) feet off the roof eve when they were installing asphalt shingles.  Antonio Yanez was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1313177, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 09/26/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 217 Old Ballwin Road, Ballwin, MO 63021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $21879

View Antonio Yanez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343811899.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.