LITCHFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO YANEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANTONIO YANEZ in 715 EAST UNION, LITCHFIELD, IL 62056 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343811899.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTONIO YANEZ
- Site address
- 715 EAST UNION
- City
- LITCHFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62056
- Mailing
- 157 RIES ROAD, BALLWIN, MO 63021
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) For Citation 1, Item 1a issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. b) For Citation 1, Item 1b issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation. c) For Citation 1, Item 2 issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jun 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. For Citation 2, Item 1 issued on 5/1/2019 with an abatement date of 5/29/2019, the employer did not provide documents demonstrating the complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- May 1, 2019
- Abate by
- May 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,126 · Current $3,126
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3126
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 1, 2019
- Abate by
- May 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to the hazard of falling during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 1, 2019
- Abate by
- May 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2500
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 1, 2019
- Abate by
- May 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $21,879 · Current $21,879
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately twenty-three (23) feet off the roof eve when they were installing asphalt shingles. Antonio Yanez was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1313177, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 09/26/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 217 Old Ballwin Road, Ballwin, MO 63021.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $21879
More inspections at Antonio Yanez
View Antonio Yanez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343811899.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.