NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI —
OSHA Inspection: VEMALINE PRODUCTS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VEMALINE PRODUCTS, INC. in 112 DILLABUR AVENUE, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852 (NAICS 332510). OSHA activity number 343913083.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VEMALINE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Site address
- 112 DILLABUR AVENUE
- City
- NORTH KINGSTOWN
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02852
- Mailing
- 112 DILLABUR AVENUE, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332510
- Employees
- 23
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $2,082 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that a hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) was completed and certified, and that the necessary PPE was selected and provided to employees for tasks such as cleaning out machines and handling metal chips.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082
- — Z (S) $3031
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,612 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items of this section. (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that the energy control procedures addressed machine specific energy sources and techniques required during the Lockout/Tag-out process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2612
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control. (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees authorized to perform Lockout/Tag-out were trained in the application of the energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I B
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that machine operators and tool room personnel who are affected by Lockout/Tag-out were trained in the energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,612 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator underwent a skills evaluation at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2612
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,612 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided on the following machines: Vertical Milling Machines, Lathe, Snow Drills, Bending Machines, Belt Sander and Bench Grinder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2612
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machines designed for fixed locations were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that floor and bench mounted pedestal drill presses were secured from movement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that a bench grinder was being used with work rests adjusted to within one eight inch, to support offhand grinding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that the bench grinder was equipped with tongue guards that were adjusted to within one fourth inch from the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $2,082 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that all employees working with chemical products underwent hazard communication training when they initially began their assignment with the company, or at any time after that.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2082
- — Z (S) $3031
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of a powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval. (a) Worksite On or about 4/5/2019, the employer did not ensure that the forklift data plate reflected the rated capacity change from using a boom attachment for offloading metal stock from box trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Vemaline Products, INC.
View Vemaline Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332510)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343913083.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.