WINDER, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ESG OPERATIONS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESG OPERATIONS, INC. in 702 CREEKSIDE LANE, WINDER, GA 30680 (NAICS 221320). OSHA activity number 344020805.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESG OPERATIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 702 CREEKSIDE LANE
- City
- WINDER
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30680
- Mailing
- 702 CREEKSIDE LANE, WINDER, GA 30680
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221320
- Employees
- 42
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.29 B02 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,474 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(2)(i): Midrails were not installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guiderail system and the walking-working surface. On 4/29/19, employees were exposed to trip and fall hazards as in areas of the facilities fall hazards were protected by a single upper chain rail only and not an upper and a lower guardrail. Instances included: a - Single chain rail at Final Effluent Flume at Cedar Creek Facility b - Single chain rails around all water treatment ponds at Water Treatment Facility c - Gap of guardrails at entry door to building - at Water Treatment Facility d - at the Grit Classifier at Marburg Facility e - at Hydrotech Disc Filter at Marburg Facility
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5474
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $4,106 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. On 4/29/19, at the Cedar Creek facility, employees were exposed to egress hazards in the as a check valve stuck out into the aisle hindering egress from the area and restricted the aisle to 11 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $4106
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,051 · Current $8,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation. On 4/29/19, the employer did not train employees who were providing service and maintenance to equipment as Authorized employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8000
- — Z (S) $8051
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section. On 4/29/19, the employer did not ensure specific written procedures were developed that indicated the magnitude of energies for equipment Authorized employees were servicing and maintaining at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,844 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. On 4/29/19, the employer did not ensure nip points and caught between hazards on machines were adequately guarded. Instances included: a Auger in Headworks area at Cedar Creek facility can b - Nip point on Belt Press Conveyor at Marburg not guarded c Auger in treatment area at Marburg facility not guarded
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $6844
1910.219 C03
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,474 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(3): Vertical or inclined shafting seven feet or less from floor or working platform was not enclosed with stationary casing(s). On 4/29/19, at the Cedar Creek waste water facility in the Filter Room, the Plant Water vertical pumps (2 count) had high speed rotating shafts exposed and not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5474
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft. On 4/29/19, at the Cedar Creek waste water facility, the employer did not ensure projecting shaft ends on the aerators (six count) did not project more than one half the diameter of the shaft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 J02 VI
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $4,106 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(vi): A receptacle installed in a wet location where the product intended to be plugged into it was not to be attended while in use (for example, sprinkler system controllers, landscape lighting, and holiday lights) did not have an enclosure that was weatherproof with the attachment plug cap inserted or removed. On 4/29/19, at the Marburg facility, employees were exposed to electrical hazards as a receptacle that was being used in a wet area had the protective covers broken off.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4106
More inspections at ESG Operations, INC.
View ESG Operations, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221320)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344020805.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.