Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAJ CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAJ CONSTRUCTION, INC. in PROMISE WAY, KENDALL PARK, NJ 08824 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344046388.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RAJ Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RAJ Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
PROMISE WAY
City
KENDALL PARK
State
NJ
ZIP
08824
Mailing
320-324 ROSEVILLE AVE, NEWARK, NJ 07107
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $2,844 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph(1).    A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: Employee(s) operating an All-Terrain Powered Industrial Truck were not properly trained in the use of personnel lifting devices (to include man basket and scaffold) attached to the forks of the PIT; or to identify the specific hazards associated with their use.      Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2844
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,834 · Current $3,794 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts  to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied: Note:  Preamble to Subpart L promulgated new paragraph (c)(2)(iv) & (v) in final rule to provide guidance. Added provision requires that in the case of fork-lifts, the entire scaffold platform be secured to the forklift.      A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: A man basket that was made of scrap materials was being used on the forks of a rough terrain fork lift.     Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3794.24
  • — Z (S) $5834

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval:  A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: A man basket that was made of scrap materials was being used on the forks of a rough terrain fork lift.   Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vii): Unauthorized personnel were permitted to ride on powered industrial trucks or a safe place to ride was not provided where riding of trucks was authorized:   A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: Employees were not prohibited from riding on a make-shift platform on the forks of an all terrain forklift.  Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,834 · Current $3,792 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.      A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: A man basket that was made of scrap materials was being used on the forks of a rough terrain fork lift; without the use of a personal fall arrest system in place and or guardrails exposing employees to fall hazards of approx. 18 feet.     Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3792
  • — Z (S) $5834

1926.100 A

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,669 · Current $7,481 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees are exposed to possible head injury from falling or flying objects or from impact with hand tools, equipment and building materials during construction operations were not wearing hard hats.       A) A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: Employee(s) working on the ground level performing framing work were not protected from falling materials as an employee was working overhead.     Occurred on or about 24 April, 2019.    The RAJ Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.100(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection 1326374, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on (10/26/2018).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $7481
  • — Z (R) $11669

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,669 · Current $7,481 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system or personal fall arrest systems:    A) Promise Way, Kendall Park, NJ 08824: Employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 35ft  without fall protection, while performing framing/roofing work on a residential  new construction home.     Occurred on or about the 24 April, 2019.    The RAJ Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1326374, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on (10/26/2018);
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $7481
  • — Z (R) $11669

View RAJ Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344046388.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.